/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19234214

>picture related

*

>>19230267

Yes. BCH hard-forked from BTC a few years ago in order to follow the original vision of Satoshi. It has the support of Mike Hearn and Gavin Andresen, who were Satoshi's closest associates, and those to whom he entrusted the continuance of the project. The idea of BCH is to continue with Satoshi's vision of making Bitcoin a genuine digital currency--"peer to peer cash," as he says in his white paper. In order to do this, the memory-size of Bitcoin has to keep growing; and this is what BCH is made to do. But a company called Blockstream, with the backing of financial institutions and the Bilberberg Group, bought out BTC in the early days and hamstringed the memory-size. BTC is so crippled that, when the price goes to $20,000, you get transactions with $100-fees and three-day waiting-times. It can only work with second-layer technology which tracks and centralizes everything you do. BTC is now nothing more than a ponzi scheme without a use-case.

Satoshi would have been completely against all this. He wanted to increase the memory-size; picture related.

Now BCH was severely damaged when Craig Wright, pretending to be Satoshi, hard-forked from it, and split the anti-core community. BTC-supporters loved it when Wright did this; they have no good reason to discredit Wright. In other words, whoever does this is most likely to be a Bitcoin Cash supporter; and it is not unlikely that the candidate is Satoshi Nakamoto himself. He's here, and he's going to rescue us.