/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22709220
Yes, as the the court eventually makes a ruling in this case that is NOT perjury, no matter who wins, it can only confirm Craig to be Satoshi.

>>20461030
He has zero to gain and everything to lose by perjuring himself.

>>15878535
>>15878546
>>15878577

You are actually retarded. Your anger also gives away your frustration. This is what literal paid disinfo looks like. Pay attention and learn, it is textbook pilpul and disinfo, trying to obscure the obvious fact that the entire case is detailing how Craig and Kleiman worked together in creating Bitcoin, and the ruling is about who the mined coins - that Craig is in possession of - belong to.

>>15625126
The entire case and ruling is specifically about the so called Satoshi partnership between Craig and Dave you mong.

>>14094424
If you read the court documents the coins clearly exist, and the plaintiff (Kleiman) is trying, and failing in laying out the case why some of them belong to him.

There is never any dispute about Craig and Kleiman's involvement in the creation of Bitcoin, only what the legal ramifications of their partnership was.