/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15879972
while signing is not absolute proof, it is about probability and credibility. IF creg were Satoshi, he would have probably just signed in the normal manner, instead of being paid to pretend he is Satoshi, repeatedly claiming he would publicly sign, then, failing to do so miserably. That he does not choose the probable path and lies in failing to do so, despite promises to the contrary, further damages his credibility.
SO, we now have one fat fraud who is paid to act out the Satoshi charade, cannot sign, has little to no credibility left, and therefore is, in all probability, EXACTLY that which he appears to be. Namely, a fat fucking disreputable fraud who is being paid by nTrust/nChain to pretend he is Satoshi. And logic tells us, the REAL Satoshi would hardly need to bother with that shite. would he ?
>tldr, sign or gtfo, you fat fucking conman

>>13475821
you can repeat shit till your pink in the face, That doesn't make it FACT, And your endless BS is tiresome already

>>13470794

>>13463905
whens the court date then, again ?