/biz/ - Business & Finance

>whitepaper says LINK must be worth a cup of coffee
>any actor with enough money to matter can start their own "oracle problem" solution and not have to depend on a market controlled by some slavs

So why is LINK a good investment again?

>>27638758
Daily reminder devs said Chainlink has to have the price of a cup of coffee for it to function.

>>27209549
This, plus coupled with the fact i've read Chainlink has to have the price of a cup coffee to function, said by some dev or even Sergay himself

Still no reason why this token isn't just a bubble

Developers have basically admited this piece of shit has to have "the price of a cup of coffee" to function, yet you still keep buying Sergay's giantic dumps.

0 fundamentals shitcoin, not even good to speculative with given BTC is overbought and about to crash the entire market

>0 fundanentals
>token has to "have the price of a cup of coffee to function"

0 fundamentals shitcoin that was designed self admited by creators to "have the price of a cup of coffee to function"

>unknown inflation rate once staking goes live
>no way to guarantee total supply stays immutable
>no reason corporations would need to enter a market dominated by early investors which consists of NEETs and developers holding an scammy amount
>will crash along with BTC once Tether is forced to get audited anyway
Crypto is a clownworld