/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19259494
check the mempool? people waking up?
i dont know?

Their goal was never to scale and improve Bitcoin. Their goal was to cripple it and, if possible, also make money off of its now engineered shortcomings.

Problem - Reaction - Solution.

"Samson Mow - Blockstream's goal is to generate profit and revenue, not to increase the value of Bitcoin."

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFOmUm-_DMQ

>>15599814
All you do is project, obfuscate and deceive its in your kike nature.

>>13655316
Satoshi gave Gavin Andresen bitcoin without asking him if he actually wanted the responsibility. He didn't, so he brought in help. So to answer your question, Gavin is the cuck.

These people later claimed Gavin's account was hacked and they never restored access even after Gavin confirmed that it was not hacked.
https://twitter.com/peterktodd/status/727078284345917441

And that's how the people that Gavin let into bitcoin kicked out Gavin from the project.

Reminder that Gavin wanted bigger blocks.

http://gavinandresen.ninja/One-Dollar-Lulz
https://www.bitcoin.kn/2015/09/adam-back-gavin-andresen-block-size-increase/?utm_campaign=dr-adam-back-and-gavin-andresen-discuss-a-block-size-increase

https://twitter.com/peterktodd/status/727078284345917441

At the very least everybody should be able to see that Craig is better for bitcoin than the people at Blockstream. If not they just don't know enough about the stagnation Blockstream has caused.

>>13415607
Gavin Andresen warned about Blockstream too
https://twitter.com/gavinandresen/status/859390357552979968