/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53602588
>unvaxxed daughter
If she is a qt I will start the bidding at 100 ounces of silver.

Metals are looking extremely bullish rn.

>>52318683
quite the opposite

>>51462843
>Quality
Overall a lot easier to deal with, much better liquidity, usually only a small collection to watch over, lower yearly expenses due to renewal fees. Feasible to put each name into seperate wallets. Twitterfags will respect you more and people will follow you. However in terms of potentially problematic names "quality" would mean big company who has the funds to track you down and fuck you over if it's more viable than buying it from you. Can't sell half of a name to take profits like you'd do with coins. High entry prices, Low risk and solid returns.
>Quantity
The opposite of almost every upside that quality has, more difficult to keep track of, high yearly expenses, low liquidity as they're usually extremely specific buyers unless we're talking about something established like digits. Can only feasibly seperate them in groups. Nobody cares about you. Easy to accuse you of squatting. The upsides are more specific, in a mass adoption scenario you will have higher ROI than quality names assuming you registered them or bought them at very low prices and they're not completely useless trash either. There's a limit to how low quality you can go even if your strategy is quantity. Owning 100 forenames with 50k-100k users worldwide (mostly in developed countries) is feasible but owning 1000 forenames with 5k-10k users worldwide (mostly in undeveloped countries) is probably unnecessary risk in comparison. That's also where it gets complicated depending on what categories you're owning, one rich person with a rare name might pay you a ton nevertheless, a smaller company might never even take notice of their name or don't care but maybe they have big plans for web3 and need it badly. Low entry prices, high risk and good returns.

In the end both are gonna do well as long as you were early, only a question of your money/time capital and risk tolerance.

>>50446020
Hello fellow high limit CSR holder. I too enjoy the perks.

Well I think that Bitcoin is indubitably bloody bollocks!

>>49520554
If you could start and run any business right now regardless of cost, what would it be?