/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19258425
They aren't fighting over who invented Bitcoin, that is already settled. Craig did, Dave Kleiman helped.

They are fighting over the rights to half of Craig's million BTC.

>>19107584
>because he would get what he wants
You have no idea what he wants. Your entire position is ridiculous and nonsensical. You say he should prove he created Bitcoin by signing, but also acknowledge that signing doesn't actually prove anything about who created the system.

Therefore signing doesn't even satisfy the requirement that you yourself put forward and there is no point doing it.

Conclusion: you are a certified retard, and your arguments are tainted with a political agenda. I can smell your paid opinions a mile away.

>>13879941
Right, the fact that there is a lawsuit at all implicitly means that Craig is Satoshi, why the fuck else would Kleiman sue him for the Satoshi coins. Both the plaintiff, defendant or the judge all accept that Craig created Bitcoin, that's not in dispute, they are just trying to figure out whether they mined bitcoin together and what the nature of their partnership was. It's not actually a lawsuit to prove he is satoshi, because if he wasn't there wouldn't be a suit at all.

Shit like this flies right over the heads of sheeple.

>>13473277
There's no dispute about whether craig and dave was involved in the satoshi group or not. They are arguing about whether they mined the bitcoin together and what legal implications their partnership had.

>>13222063
>How do you store something that is tending to infinity in size.
If people are willing to pay the required fees, I'm sure the miners wont bother building industrial scaled mining operations with the needed storage space. Why would they not want to make money? I thought the competition amongst miners for profit was the heart of how bitcoin works. I realise I might be wrong so please educate me

Pic related really makes my nogger nogg. Howbaut u?