/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18961019
I lose a good deal. Which is actually the only reason I don't do it. If NAT would suddenly surge and EURN sits in its normal range then I would swap in a heartbeat. But as it stands, probably won't happen as if they surge they all will at once. I feel it is reliable, but I also feel like the fleet isn't as strong and like as if it was run up a ton already.

>>18961082
>>18961161
I think calling it trash is a bit much, it is very healthy financially and retail cushion is a positive once things go up. Honestly no one actually knows their health until earnings come out. I just didn't buy into EURN over NAT because it is newer and has a small trading range, unknown potential. These other tankers have a known enormous potential, but EURN has sat in the same few dollars since inception which....is a good thing finance wise for the company, but also "well, where do we go?" too. idk, if NAT explodes first I might be able to switch otherwise my finances are kind of tied to my positions now....if I want to maximize in share numbers at least.