/biz/ - Business & Finance

>AMD
I feel nothing

Bump
>>26638117
Me too. Otherwise people will immediately think about selling and killing the momentum, which would be the right move. Organic growth is what's needed here, not sudden green spikes that won't be maintained. That's basic game theory.
>>26638689
>>26639600
I unironically get where you're coming from, anon. However while they might be off putting, I believe it's a little naive to think that a few tourists and outsiders can really have that much of an impact of the price and/or exposure. This is already beyond /biz/'s reach in term of influence. You're welcome for the gains, glad I helped you there.
>>26639579
>Yes, they are Anon but flow of wallet control are multisig. Meaning no one single entity decides the flow
My main gripe with anon team is the lack of accountability if things go south. Anything could happen (hack, mint function or whatever black swan scenario you can think of) and we would have no reliable way to tell if it was an inside job or not etc. Whereas a non anon team will have this in their track record and might be more than willing to at least reimburse or fix issues with their reputation and name at stake. This is what worries me the most with DeFi projects. Hence why I will always tell people to think at least twice before buying any anon team. Not saying that scams don't happens with public but at least you have people to hold accountable.

Bump.
>>23013367
I hope it'll be sustainable until then.