/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23964127
You would have stopped mining in 2011 or 2012 when the competition got too fierce and you would have cashed out several years before the 2017 bullrun.

Don't feel bad.

>>23965564
Only literal brainlets look at the price and think that it means BTC is better than BCH.

>>23965597
BCH has all the oldschool believers and BCH has all the innovation but being better doesn't mean you automatically beat the biggest brand.

>>15808563
pen and paper tabs is the best way to scale BTC

>>13536232
BCH (ABC) is a thousand times better than BTC (Core).

>>13536263
The critical flaw is not just a meme.

Craig Wright's old SegWit analysis:
https://nchain.com/en/blog/risks-of-segregated-witness-mining-cartels/
Peter Rizun's SegWit concern about when no miner checks or saves the witness data:
https://youtu.be/hO176mdSTG0

It's a bad sign of where the world is headed but at least it's just a DNS "block" (if that can even be called a block).

Just use any open DNS, like for example OpenDNS. But don't use Google's spy DNS like a faggot.

>>12023786
I've been shilling BCH the whole year and are now with BSV because the point of Bitcoin Cash was to remove the limits, not fuck around with the protocol or introducing checkpoints. If we just blindly follow the devs and exchanges we might as well just stick with the fiat system.

BSV is bitcoin and that's just the way it is.

>>11820913
BCH believes they are the right coin because they have made the technically correct decision at every fork of an extremely hostile environment for the past ten years. They have more scale and decentralisation than any other coin, and each step in the process has acted as an intelligence filter leaving only those who truly understand what the fuck all this is about in terms of ends as well as how to get there in terms of means.
They are the people who have simply been observably correct at every single juncture in crypto. If you wanted to pick a group that have proven themselves elite in trial by fire, they are it. They didn't fall for core's bullshit arguments at extremely low onchain throughput, they didn't fall for central bank subversion in the form of lightning bakkt and liquid, and they also didn't fall for technically ignorant blowhards that just said the technical problems would solve themselves and dedicated all their efforts to bluster and self promotion.
They took the perfect correct path through the decade long storm of chaos, and I am proud to be by their sides.

He's not.
Armani is correct tactically but not strategically. SV is not trying to deliver bitcoin to the banks, they already did that themselves in the view of enough of the majority that the minority who knows better are irrelevant to their goals and can presently be safely ignored.
SV is all about making that no longer the case. We won't be safely ignored. We built this. We understood it from the beginning far better than the incompetent corrupt cunts in who siezed power in their proof of social media chain.
This is simply the reckoning.
All he is saying that "supports the state" is that bitcoin requires the law to work. Not what form of law, not amlkyc which is directly contrary to Ayre's interests that's for fucking sure, but the law that keeps the mass of human activity from breaking down into self destructive unproductive shit like snuff films and gladiators and other monetizing of the darkest aspects of human nature. Without this money invulnerable to political authority simply becomes a channel through which this nightmare can emerge, and don't fool yourself into thinking there aren't those trying to push it into reality.
That is the law that is necessary. The law that keeps the economy high functioning and productive. That pushes the best parts of humanity into a brighter future rather than shackles them to neither the will to power of clueless politically connected assholes, nor psychopathic warmongering mental patients with a hard on for violence.

Remember remember

Come one come all, there won't be any congestion. 5 tx/s or 50 tx/s, no matter, there's plenty of room for all and low fees for everyone.

>>11389794
dont forget the 40 bucks you pay for that speedy 30 minute transaction

>>11349775
it's not like BCH was "created", it's just bitcoin with bigger blocks... compared to LN having bigger blocks actually works.

limiting blocks to 1 MB every 10 minutes is beyond retarded
<-- this image is 0.9 MB and it takes you a few seconds at most to download it
nobody actually believes miners wouldn't be able to handle blocks larger than 1 MB. you'd have to have some pretty heavy ulterior motives to not expand beyond 1 MB

even if you just expand to 2 MB it would still have given BTC several years to develop a working scaling solution instead of this broken shitshow that is LN.

>>11328672
it's more likely for a 500 USD bitcoin to 10x than a 6000 USD bitcoin to 10x

>>11228800
BCH flipping BTC is not just a possibility, it's only a matter of time.
Don't be dense.

yeah yeah blah blah BCH isn't the real bitcoin

>>10997547
Crazy that people are upset over this, anyone that have paid attention would already know that bitcoin has a new ticker. I understand why though, there's a lot of misinformation out there.

BCH will win eventually.

The prices in autumn 2018 doesn't matter one bit in the grand scheme of things.

Could this be the destined minimum +5% increase every day for three months?

>>10894643
I'm all in on BCH, don't you worry.

>>10881555
Imagine if we could reason this "problem" out of existance.
How can we convince you that ideas cannot be killed?