/biz/ - Business & Finance

57cents!

>every single coin

Whatabout the fith one?

>>4417479
>>4417457
>>4417430
>>4417409
>>4417387
>>4417369
>>4417338
>>4417312
>>4417215
>>4417197
>>4417138


People that keep saying things like "why would banks use chainlink when they can just make their own version" clearly don't understand the fundamentals of this project. Chainlink's goal is not to "be used" like (e.g.) Ripple hopes to achieve.
Chainlink is merely the bridge that enables data which is outside of the Ethereum 'universe', to communicate with it, and thus execute various actions. Thus, it's not unlikely that adopters will use their own private blockchain (biggest reason would be to avoid the market fluctuations in it's value). But - what will they use to get their data, onto the blockchain - whether it be their own token, eth, etc... Chainlink.

1. Eth and smartcontracts. We all know smartcontracts are revolutoinary, but their use cases are limited. Smartcontracts are awesome, but they are confined within the blockchain and data on the blockchain. In otherwords, right now smartcontracts are "you send 1 eth and I'll send back 1000 McTokens", and this contract is verifiable/trustless/amazing but its stuck within the universe of Ethereum and the data Ethereum understands

2. It is possible to use external data to inform these contracts, but right now that process is centralized. This is a problem. Lets say the external data is a transaction of Dollars for ETH. So you send 300$ to bank account X, and then I send one Eth to your address. Right now you either do that through a third party (CoinBase), OTC (LocalBitcoins) or whatever else centrlized system you want to use.

Knocking out that centralization, where you have to trust someone, is THE key to SmartContracts having a real world use case. But how do you get that information -- the fact that the $300 has been sent -- onto the blockchain using data that the smartcontract understands?

What's the difference between LINK/BTC and LINK/ETH? Other than the currency that is being used to buy Link? Is there an advantage for one?

>>4122293
correct sir, i have made a huge bet on chainlink, and altho holding was painful, i would not risk it.

it is a 100% sure bet, compared to seeing all the shitcoins moon left right centre...

when the team announces stuff and releases more info for all the normies, we will end up in the only place

>the solar system

>>4029496
it is just a matter of time before everybody will make usecases with chainlink. stay tuned ladies

How bow dah?

>>4000130

>>3987287
>>3987287
So you now own about 2.5% of all the chainlinks in circulation. Congratulations!

>>3973100
me too marine

don't give up hope

our time will come

>>3960112

good luck anon

linkmarines will never forget the day they got rich

>do not sell until $100

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>3957107
im holing on fellow anon marine. temptation will be hard but we will take over

>>3950392
This

spread this fucking meme now anons

>>3945981
exactly. and them banks will want to buy their LINK tokens so they can set up master nodes so they can use a profitable oracle operation too

>>3944462

>realize i also been shitposting about LINK
>realize i dont give a fuck
>realize i like this

LINKMARINES
NEVER
SURRENDER

we will prevail

>we live rent free in your head

they will get into LINK for sure. it's so fcking obvious. they know and they will buy

>>3943400
correct sir

this is gonna fucking explode mate

anon

i feel you bro

>i bought link
>you can too
>break free from the matrix

>>3943307
>>3943273 (OP)
>>3943307

we're all gonna make it

sergey is god

and the god has spoken