[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.14368576 [View]
File: 125 KB, 534x401, DUMP IT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14368576

join the big boy earning squadron
use code "teganmac"
were all gonna have lambo money by EOY

>> No.14164489 [View]
File: 125 KB, 534x401, DUMP IT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14164489

It's over guys, were not gonna make it
expect $0 eval by the end of the week
people in the know like me are getting out now while we still can
>inb4 source
you'll see news outlets reporting on it by tommorow or within a few days

>> No.13354455 [View]
File: 125 KB, 534x401, chainlinkburgandy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13354455

>>13354266
that's great anon

>> No.13177356 [View]
File: 125 KB, 534x401, chainlinkburgandy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13177356

>>13173162
Anon I....

>> No.12684165 [View]
File: 125 KB, 534x401, this-just-in-chainlink-worth-000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12684165

Puzzle for the deluded linkies out there

>One benefit often touted of smart contracts is that they can automate payment without the need for dunning notices or other collection expenses and without the need to go to court to obtain a judgment mandating payment. While this is indeed true for simpler use cases, it may be less accurate in complex commercial relationships. The reality is that parties are constantly moving funds throughout their organization and do not “park” total amounts that are due on a long-term contract in anticipation of future payment requirements. Similarly, a person obtaining a loan is unlikely to keep the full loan amount in a specified wallet linked to the smart contract. Rather, the borrower will put those funds to use, funding the necessary repayments on an ad hoc basis.
>If the party owing amounts under the smart contract fails to fund the wallet on a timely basis, a smart contract looking to transfer money from that wallet upon a trigger event may find that the requisite funds are not available. Implementing another layer into the process, such as having the smart contract seek to pull funds from other wallets or having that wallet “fund itself” from other sources, would not solve the problem if those wallets or sources of funds also lack the requisite payment amounts. The parties might seek to address this issue through a text-based requirement that a wallet linked to the smart contract always have a minimum amount, but that solution simply would give the party a stronger legal argument if the dispute was adjudicated. It would not render the payment operation of the smart contract wholly automatic. Thus, although smart contracts will render payments far more efficient, they may not eliminate the need to adjudicate payment disputes.
>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/05/26/an-introduction-to-smart-contracts-and-their-potential-and-inherent-limitations/

>> No.11128944 [View]
File: 125 KB, 534x401, this-just-in-chainlink-worth-000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11128944

It's true.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]