/biz/ - Business & Finance

I haven't been here in 4 years.
Did chainlink moon or not?
Did anyone get a lambo?

>>55306981
Chainlink was selected by the World Economic Forum's Tipping Point report as the "Shift in Action" for Smart Contracts, for their work on allowing smart contracts in the Bitcoin network to be automatically triggered by external data. -
(https://image.slidesharecdn.com/worldeconomicforumtippingpoint2015blockchain41-170330211144/95/world-economic-forum-tipping-points-report-1-638.jpg?cb=1490908469))))

Chainlink is partnered with Cornell's IC3, to help launch the first Intel SGX secured link between smart contracts and external data. This more secure way of running an oracle is the future and they're glad to be moving it forward.
- (https://create.smartcontract.com/#/contracts/cc3ea3c76b5a60f171e0eaf223146f34?tab=info))))


Chainlink has been chosen as a 2017 Blockchain Applications Cool Vendor by Gartner. This validates the value that CTOs and CIOs see in our more secure approach to connecting smart contracts with critical external resources. - (https://www.gartner.com/doc/3698947/cool-vendors-blockchain-applications-))))

Chainlink is presently working with SWIFT on their own SWIFT Smart Oracle. Allowing smart contracts on various networks to make payments, send governance instructions, and release collateral with over 11,000 banks. - (https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/key/HJglipax9KmMPx))))

>>54746953

oscm for u, im doing MY part

>>53837568
nice, i don't think i've seen this one before

>>27519144

i ALWAYS FUCK UP THE TIMING

See you cocksuckers in Saint Tropez for the yacht party

>>21403054
>they will begin to feel the fire (electricity)
Thanks 42. I like your posts.

>>20972320

The few, the proud

>>19828002
this but unironically

>>18879582
Never. Fuck these shit fucking cunts. None of them deserve anything. If they were honest and good friends, I wouldn't mind spilling the sauce but they are all shitty people at the end of the day.

>>18654505
the best time to buy is when you don't want to buy because you think it's going to keep crashing (see: Mar20 sub-2$, Dec19 sub-2$, Dec18 sub-.20cent, July18 sub-.20cent) During those times, it's hard to even pull the trigger, because you think it's gonna keep going down. now is not one of those times, but shit is probably gonna pop off in May so you could also miss a ladder up to double digits

t. all in >2yrs

>30 minutes

>>17133477

Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/ back last month during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth.

Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons.

Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story.

The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes.

In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

>>16787405
damn dude

legit glad you got back on track

>>15967688
sorry i'm all out of hopium, it's why i stopped making these threads

we literally have people like ISDA coming out left and right and basically confirming LINK will underpin an entirely new derivatives ecosystem and we are still $2.35. link would've went 100x by now in 2017.
it's all a waiting game though, we are just in the most boring part of the market cycle. link will simply explode once the market sentiment is right.

Comfy wallpaper thread?

there's blood in the streets frens, this is when we secure our future.

yeah i'll think we'll be fine

https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/pull/1272#pullrequestreview-285120480

>>15304031