/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29723027
I would aim to lose 100oz to Poseidon if possible.

>>29701095
Very nice anon, you're doing very well for yourself.

>>29570494
>be me
>buy most of my stack between 2014-2016
>$13.50/ozt
>sales of only $0.60 over spot
>fast forward to 2019
>beautiful, clear summer day
>smug kayak noises
>bring my littlest salty dog and my ~300ozt stack our for an afternoon on the water
>is that a boat?
>JFC, it's a state trooper and he's headed right for me!
>Statie blasts by me, rocking me in my little kayak and forcing my dog and my silver overboard
>dog floats
>silver - not so much
>The sea is a cruel mistress

>>29433548
I remember buying at $13.50/ozt with a $0.60-over-spot premium

>>27567933
I collected 270 ounces at 13.50 bro.

>>27391503
It's not about me. I stack for my grandkids.

>>20096989
Beautiful.

>>19919041
>1 post by this ID
>no stack pic
K

>>19339470
Don't care. My stack is for my grandkids.

>>18998739
Seriously speaking, I was always advised by collectors in my family to buy 10ozt bars or less. Reason was that 10ozt bars were generally the smallest bar a foundry would take at a reasonable premium while 10ozt bars also generally being the largest bar most collectors can afford at one time.

It was old-timey advice, I just didn't know it when I started stacking. I see a lot of kilo bars and 100ozt bars floating around and my LCS says the biggest bar he'd buy from a customer is a kilo. Still, you won't lose your money buying 10ozt bars exclusively and the premium is generally lower than 1ozt bars or 5ozt bars.

>>18662682
>Is it safe to post how much I got on 4chan?
Pictures? Sure, just scrub the exif data first. Actually I think 4chan scrubs exif data automatically now, can anyone confirm?

Pic related, taken with a Nikon digital camera - no GPS data, no correct time/date data.

Besides, "The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."

>>17891218
>allegedly
despite your position in this argument, even YOU do not have the confidence to say that 100% these services are backed by a 1:1 ratio of gold and silver. You still use a qualifier, in case you're wrong.
That should tell you something.

>>1830678