/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51300469
>I'm not biased.
a-assumed everyone in this thread were biased toward kadena
>don't think the consensus method is particularly important myself. If anything the end game of PoW
i agree i dont see pow staying relevant once the entire world is coordinated on the same infrastructure, from where it wouldve achieved its endgame. maybe it really is like how steam railways helped to bootstrap industrialization, but this time it is algorithmic
>No way the earth becomes the matrix where we just farm as much energy as possible
survival games make everyone blind when short-term strategies outweight long-term ones, its actually possible
>agreement would ultimately probably be enforced by violence
force might always be required at the end of the line, but many financial incentive structures can still peacefully preserve society
>now that is especially complicated
idea is to eventually make some kind of tensorflow-like framework for tokenomics and algorithmic markets (self-adjusted supply from a price function). i think there are some voting schemes that have been overlooked. for example, quadratic voting can be applied at many layers of ballots (i.e. rather than on actor basis, it can be done on outcomes or group of outcomes) but it can also be generalized, including "squared voting" which does the opposite of quadratic voting by rewarding late sellers. both can be combined to create markets that are "normed" entanglement where the output is subsequently used in self-referential distribution thus leading to potentially interesting reputation systems. havent explored much but im pretty sure there are still many other ideas
>no funding/no VCs
it doesnt seem crypto was ready for adoption back then. it shouldve been impossible to sustain anything without capital. nowadays dapps without any fundings are more likely to takeoff, or at least its not impossible
>'truthful natures' is questionable at least
i think defining "truth" is a metaphysical problem in and of itself