/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55580606
at the time of purchase i quit my job and blew all my paid out PTO $$ to scoop 50k stinkers

>>55580018
>>55580624
it's really ironic that i want to utilize future assassination contracts on the guy that's creating them

Lets OMEGALUL at all the LINK MARINES that took a 50% haircut from withdrawing their LINKIES from Bancor. They are going to be seething so hard when those that stayed get 100% of their stack back.

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Sell your Chainlink

>>29098758
>mfw you have to actually explain this because the majority of /biz/ genuinely has no fucking clue what you’re talking about now

Two one six... hmmmm number number number....

>>25476038
$12650 american

Chad hebrew.

>>25146666
Checked.

>>24867735
anon, they always look retarded

>>23693683
>Why do people spend real money on investments and then not bother to consume any information about those investments?
i consume every single piece of LINK info that is publicly available with hours of it being published, work permitting, i have been doing this for almost 2.5 years, i am completely ready

>>22709187
if you watched Ed's keynote he said (paraphrasing) "Arbitrum will execute correctly as long as you trust yourself", implying a viable scenario for NEET nodes: if you're using EVM dapps as an honest user then it is in your interest to run versions of those dapps on an arbitrum node, there is no reason not to allow NEET nodes since the initial arbitrum committees will be formed of the trusted network that Chainlink the company has been forming for the past year+, especially if those NEET nodes have an interest in correctly executing EVM contract code (they are honest users), all that's left to assume is that Arbitrum is bug free, probably the reason it's taken so long to launch since announcement (along with T sigs) is that they're performing the most rigorous and expensive formal verification, and they're doing it many many times

put simply, the proof for the existence of at least one honest validator is that you trust yourself to be honest, and you have an interest in honest contract execution, so you can be that one honest validator; it's absurd to assume the alternative case: there is not in the entire smart contract using world a single self-trusting actor who wants to honestly use a smart contract dapp

>>22542126
4th industrial revolution

Insider here.
>Staking wont be ready until 2022 due to a complicated set of circumstances.
>Smartcon will be a regular event that just shows the importance of Defi and smart contracts.

Thats it. Do what you will with this information.

Simeon.. that was a sloppy, sloppy job.. What should we do with such a filthy man?

You semen slurping europoors are pathetic. Where js the $11 waiting room thread?

>>21054073
You don't actually believe this innit? I'm seriously getting worried about marines mental health. Started as good banter but it's getting scary now.

About the governance bit. Can't Maker build their own aggregation contract and then problem solved? They'll be able to chose their feeds and quorum. What am I missing here?

When the dollar collapses how are you going to cash out your crypto gains?

You already know the answer to this question

>>20294148
why do you want to stay poor?

Wait anon, you sold? Under $5? I am sorry.

>>19132677
Good shit, I cant wait to see what happens.