/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>28562832
this

>>28082740
stay delusional, its literally never reaching $2

>>27403684
These didnt age so well

>>26896191
coffee is getting real expensive...

>>26576927
The cycle will return. Linkies will say, "We'll go back to $20 any day now!"

>>26508836

You can calculate your APY%. If you do 200% yearly, it's 16% a month (keep in mind you need to stake for 5 weeks for the 2x multiplier)

So on 1K BNT which is now $2,000, you'll make $320, paid out in BNT. You can withdraw or restake them anytime

>>26486806
>tfw player-in-the-know

I don’t see a problem with vaping weed after a long day of work/accomplishing your goals. I do that around 6 pm and then go for a long walk and it helps me unwind and get some fresh air. What do you anons think, still bad for me?

>t. someone that will still probably do it anyway

Imagine thinking your shitcoin will ever reach $1 KEK

>>25926144
People used to say that about $1 then $5 and $10

>>25870315
>so they feel the need to attack what they perceive as bubbles, because seeing (apparent) bubbles going up worries them that their investment outlook and understanding of the future development in the space might be wrong.
Interesting take, might have some truth to it. For most it is probably the self flagellation their egos inflict on themselves for having "known" about an asset before it went exponentially up in value. See /r/buttcoin for a case study on how this spawns very contradictory and odd behaviors.


>If you bought prior to October 2019, then you've made a very slight amount of money against BTC. If you bought in since then, you've lost money.
Although I see the point you are trying to make, cherry picking timeframes to judge the worth of an investment is not a productive exercise. Unless you manage to time the absolute bottom and absolute top of the #1 top performing asset in the world (in an arbitrary timeframe), someone can always draw up the comparison to whatever you invested in and tell you "hah, you actually LOST value versus this asset!". In my eyes that's a moot point to make.

LINK ICO was $0.14 in 2017
LINK peaked at $1.20 in 2018
LINK peaked at $4.50 in 2019
LINK peaked at $20 in 2020

No matter what BTC does, it doesn't change the fact that LINK has been one of the best performing assets of the last few years. That being said I do believe LINK will outperform BTC again in 2021.

>Eventually I believe even buying LINK at 20c will be a mistake when you could have just bought BTC.
Whether LINK does outperform BTC or doesn't, I think you are in the wrong mindset. Making money is making money. Don't kick yourself over missed opportunities. I'm about 40% BTC and 60% LINK. My 2020 has been very good.

>t. 2017 SIBOS linkie

>>25026457
i think its a buy but not now. its going from 1.2b circulating supply to 8.5b in the next 24 months. then expected to go to 11b over the next 3 years after that. ill probably buy into it in 2023 when its back in the 5-10cent range. its going to bounce between 30-80cents until then. similar to the old link cycle

>>24934802
>He probably holds more than you mate.
Highly doubt it.
>ALL link hate threads are posted by ICO buyers
This used to be the case in 2018, but those threads created their fare share of actual anti-LINK zealots. It's easy to recognize the oldfag "Lmao you fell for the LINK is a meme meme meme" gatekeeping and the "hehe LINK is finally dropping, I can now post my laughing spic image again" newfaggotry.

>>23462703
FUD now is just tiny tiny shadow of what it once was. Try holding a no name project that cratered from $1.20 to $0.20 and isn't even in the top 100 anymore while everyone and their grandma is telling you to sell. Shit wasn't pretty.

>>22056660
> I DO NOT WANT YOU TO SELL, BELIEVE ME
Several of my limit sells were hit this last run. My bank account smiles upon me noLinker, can you say the same? Here, have an ancient noLinker meme. Perhaps it even gave you great joy back in the day! (If you were already around here back then!)

>>21851996

>>21136499
>Nolinker detected

>>21009047

>>20978136
This.

>>20924336
original

>people think OG marines are going to sell at $6 when they bought in sub-50 cents

>>20615697
Nvm found it