/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56850371
Mining would be insanely profitable if Bitcoin wasn't turned to unusable shit.

>>51025219
The increased costs of running Monero's network are reflected in the rewards. The incentives are setup to keep people improving the system. You're saying it can't be done. I'm telling you, you've never tried. Theoretical limits on throughput put out there by developers have been broken multiple times over the years. It's just an excuse.

You can't refute any of my points about L2.

>>20824789
Come on. I do a compilation of the best. For all tastes.

How about this?

>>20824819
I lurk enough. Just answer the damn question. Isnt it safer holding PONK in an exchange like MXC?

I dont wanna wake up and see my PNK's price -30%

>>20728574
Literally the only point of a crypto is that it is instant, cheap online payments. BTC killed that usecase, so it's just one giant heap of trash.

But you still didn't get the point. BTC literally can NOT scale, and having more transactions coming in will congest the network into total dysfunction. The transaction bottleneck makes a proper bullrun technologically impossible. As more people buy, the mempool fills, transactions get delayed for hours and even days, and fees skyrocket to $10, 20, 50, 100+++ USD per transaction.

t. someone who understands what a block limit is.

>>19102247
>>19102273
You are a retard if you think BTC will ever break it's all time high ever again.

It's broken technology. Growth is stifled at a 1MB block, meaning it can't scale and grow and therefore the usecase is limited to being a speculative pump and dump asset.

In order for Bitcoin to grow to these prices, it requires mass adoption. Which is something BTC can never accomplish.

>>18246411
>Transaction rates have nothing to do with price but with usability and yes at 500k tx per day it bottlenecked.
>But it had nothing to do with the price.

How the fuck do you expect people to buy it when they can't even move any coins? Do you not understand what happened in 2017?

>>16351912
>Imagine where Bitcoin would've been without the insanely high fees
this, It could have been used to actually make applications that was not possible before bitcoin made microtransactions possible. BTC killed microtransactions with high fees

>>16340386
He's not wrong you pleb

>>16321665
> Pretty much the exact moment BTC hit a scaling cap alts took off. Literally the only reason alts have ANY relevance at all is because BTC was kneecapped in both scale and utility.

Yep. Pic related.

>>15979711
>t. retard.

>>14193860

BTC will lose

Also I may add, the BTC camp is absolutely TERRIFIED of BSV and CSW, they are the ones with huge paid shill teams.
BSV can literally do everything ethereum can and more, the core devs removed this functionality from btc early, vitalik originally wanted to build ethereum on the BTC network but decided not to because of the core devs. Now hes calling bsv a scam because he's feeling threatened.

>>14025182
It literally can't scale

How many bsv to make it frens?

Corecucks are finished.

B S V
S
V

>>13984593
Better graph