/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50931311
>2 months
You are a baby. Try 5 years

>>18284874
picrelated. Don't be fooled by what you saw on the media. Many of these faggots don't want refugees because they want government gibs for themselves. The people there have a sick relationship with the state and it's easy to see by how much they want to stay in the EU. There is a nationalist sentiment but many are statist cucks.
>There's certainly a lot of those people but they aren't the majority.
There are enough and in critical positions to keep the country pozzed til the end of times
I also can''t see the point of this thread. Ethereum is the OG sjw coin. Also many "projects" in crypto these days are by default compatible to communism and sjw ideology. Open borders in the way I have been shilled by lefties over the years, Dismantling any kind of hierarchy and absolute equality amongst others. Bonus points for the general secretaries who are in key positions such as founders, ceos and other executive positions happen to benefit at the expense of idiots who fall for the scams and get dumped on. So, to answer OP's question
>Is crypto compatible with communism and sjw ideology? How do you reconcile the two?
Absolutely. They already are

>>18034001
Blockchain is a double-edged sword for governments in their current form. On one hand you have China who wants control over its citizens and blockchain facilitates this. On the other hand you have us eurocucks with "the right to be forgotten" where an immutable database is opposing this. An "unprecedented" event could lead to implementation of a controlling technology that takes elements from bitcoin's technology. The EU has been showin interest in blockchain, which I see is their way of implementing a hybrid technology that the superstate that the eu wants to become will try to force upon us
>A minarchist world would be cool.
picrelated

>>17558450
>Well, I realize that it's basically a cult here now
picrelated
> But do you think it's this cult that's actually moving the money?
No
You may have already answered that, but do you believe LINK has potential to rise more? What's the price LINK could reach? I'm still going through the archived threads and can't yet say for sure

>>16076343
Yup. People shit on LINK for Sergey's 700k dumps. Wait until they understand what's gonna happen here. Supply will have doubled in a year will kill this coin if they keep delaying and keep their shitty marketing team. Now wait until the shills start screeching muh fud.
>>16076443
i chuckled

>>15653218
I'm a newfag and a brainlet so you can preemptively discard my opinion. I agree that it is bs especially when talking 1+ year from today. $1k after halving, which is now yet known if it will pump or not, is a very bold prediction. As for your OP, we're both late but I am at the same spot as you, only 4 years older. I'm already looking to buy rope

>>13825019
I'm about to panic sell at 280 to cover my losses bc I bought a smol stack. Only reason for that is /biz/ shills it as a weekend pump and it looks like it. I don't know if it is worth my time to even look up info on this coin.
>>13825056
pic related