/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9721004
Right, meaning if they really had gone with the longest chain metric as defining BTC, there would have been no contest at all, BTC would be what the miners were mining, core would be effectively fired and banished, and the community would be unified behind that still. Maybe bcore would've forked and been allocated a new symbol, but they wouldn't have the incumbency on their side, and their vision would have to stand on its own for valuation by the market without that incumbency.

And in that context, it's hard to imagine it would be anything more than a minor shitcoin.

>>9530949

>>9477062
BTC isn't superior, it's a sabotaged product designed to destroy the decentralised aspects of the system and bring it back under banking control.
If the choice is that or we burn it all to the ground, we burn it all to the ground.
The original vision will not be stopped, and certainly not because of some quaint boomer analogy about not having paid one's dues that actually applies far better in reverse, as it's Maxwell's vision which is the upstart, not Satoshi's.

>>9428185
> IF I CAN'T HAVE IT NOBODY CAN
> IF BLOCKBUSTER DIES ITS THE END OF VIDEO.
Gas yourself you retarded small minded cunt. I am seriously getting a boner knowing how hard you're about to get fucked by the market.

>>9405439
Contradiction is not an argument. The numbers I gave are factually correct, and you are flatly wrong. I have been a software developer for over twenty years, and you strike me as a cheerleader that knows nothing technical at all and simply follows the loudest asshole with no understanding whatsoever about what is actually being discussed.