/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56669049
>They use a Google Cloud Oracle as the default one.

>>56668425
>Google Cloud oracle

Does anyone know of a profitable business that uses chainlink? I mean as a consumer that actually buys eth and powers their application with it, not middle men like google cloud that just integrate with it. Why would they want their customer's private data going through the public ethereum blockchain, wouldn't that undermine their ability to collect and sell data? Why would a company buy volatile chuck e cheese tokens to power their applications when AWS and Google sell the same service in dollars at a stable price?

>>18574185
>what's fake is calling it a partnership or integration
It doesn't matter what you want to call it.

It's absolutely insane that almost a year later you're still clinging to semantics to soothe your butthurt.

>>18148936
>Google Cloud and Oracle what?
Literal Oracle integration according to Oracle itself.

As for Google Cloud, whatever you want to call pic related.

>>18146600
Oh I did.

>>17840100
shhh no tears, just cope

>>17569435
>>17569442
>>17569405
Feed me more cope.

>>17463506
>Google actively shilling a project they worked with Chainlink on
>"not a partnership"

Juuuuuuust cope.

>>16595872
>>16595896
>>16595943
>>16595950
>>16595959
>>16595964
Holy fucking samefag lmao.

Oden isn't some random project you know, it's backed by a co-founder of Skype and Kazaa.
And doing a little interview =/= doing a tech-heavy deep dive like Google Cloud did with Chainlink.
Not to mention Google Cloud's testnet node on Chainlink.

>>16286187
cope

>>15933670
>overblown hype on blogpost
All these months later, and anon here still can't cope.

Cope.

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/building-hybrid-blockchain-cloud-applications-with-ethereum-and-google-cloud

Let's discuss the viability of Chainlink for mass-adoption and any possible competition or pitfalls.

>>15777640
>nobody needs yet another centralized oracle library.
Apparently they do, see pic.

>Makerdao feeds v2 are the most likely candidate for the oracle standard
Good thing Makerdao is itself looking to Chainlink:
https://wyre-talks.simplecast.com/episodes/fc4e10f3-fc4e10f3
1:15

>>15757595
>chainlink for example it only partners with other cryptos not real world companies
cope

>>15736785
>"partnership"
In mainstream business, you very often pay to be a "partner".
What google cloud did with Chainlink is much more than that.

It's been so long now, please start coping for your own sake.

>>15735652
>here's next to zero interest in developing using chainlink.

>>15618072
Over three months and you're STILL completely unable to cope with the Google Cloud thing.

Well, cope.

>>15281395
>> To use our shit
Because Chainlink is middleware you retard.

>When does Google start paying Chainlink, let alone buy coins?
See pic.

>>15264920
cope

>>15006224
>About as significant as that time Google blogged about Dogecoin.
lmao, Google never did anything even remotely close to pic related for Doge.
cope

>>14728633

>>14723595
>The only kind of movement up that happens as a result of good news is long term as actual value gets pushed into the asset from adoption.
Adoption like pic related?
Or Oracle?

Dev here, let's make something clear about this image. It does NOT represent an integration. Again LINK and its shills are lying to pump their bags.

Let's break it down.

#1. App Engine. What is that? It's a hosting service. It hosts your apps or websites. It's like buying a laptop, leaving it on 24/7 and running your app on it. It can run ANY app out of the box. Just like a computer can run ANY app. There's no integration. It's like if an HP employee bought an HP laptop and installed a Chainlink node on it t demo it. Is that an integration/partnership? No. That's what's going on here.

#2. BigQuery. What is that? It's database as a service. What's a database? It's an app like MS Excel that writes/reads to a file, except it's a lot faster than excel so you can use it to persist data for your apps. Does it need an integration? No, it already works out of the box with any app. It's a public service. As a general rule, like 95% of the time, all databases can work with all apps. Also, databases don't adapt to applications, applications adapt to databases.

Does Google provide any useful data publicly on BigQuery like youtube, maps, search results, etc? No. BigQuery is made so that customers import their own data. Google doesn't use Chainlink. They're just presenting it as a demo for their own customers to use, to SELL it. It's a SALES PITCH for BigQuery. BigQuery has some public datasets, but none of them are Google's data, they are just a few shitty public datasets that people can play with (Like Eth price).