[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.50810452 [View]
File: 40 KB, 500x377, 1636924050874.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50810452

>>50810207
low effort troll

>> No.49260747 [View]
File: 40 KB, 500x377, 1637137620238.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49260747

>>49260253
Let's say he had $100 to his name
>bought goat for $60, now has $40 left
>sold goat for $70, now has $110
>bought again for $80, now has $30
>sold goat for $90, now has $120
So he made $20, right?

But if I look at the buys and sells, and reset the original amount of money to match the highest buying price, what do we get?

>starts with $80
>buys goat for $60, has $20 left
>sells it for $70, now has $90
>buys it back for $80, now has $10
>sells it again for $90, now has $100
alright, so $20 in profit again.

but what about

>man only has $60 to his name
>buys goat for $60, now has no money
>sell it for $70, now has $70
>Buys it back for $80 after borrowing $10 from a friend, now owes friend $10
>sells the goat again for $90, now has $90
>pays $10 back to the friend who loaned him money
>now has $80
$20 in profit again

OR

if we're counting the amount of money he COULD'VE made if he had just held onto the goat (bought at $60, sold at $90 for $30 of profit), he technically lost $10 of potential profit. Nonetheless, in reality he still made $20 in profit.

I'm I retarded? I just typed this out as I thought through it

>> No.29217613 [View]
File: 40 KB, 500x377, 1613301046054.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29217613

>>29217414
Donuts could be used to pay jannies/mods? Not sure how to feel about that.

>> No.28735885 [View]
File: 40 KB, 500x377, 1613268243450.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
28735885

>>28722738
>buys baghorse when there's far more appealing microcaps

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]