/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54326146
The modern Chinese model is actually closer to the ancient Western model, specifically the Roman Republic under the Senate. A small clique of privileged individuals arising from the masses through noble familial ties advance through the cursus honorum to stand as oligarchs governing the country according to established custom altered only occasionally with great difficulty by broad consensus. To become a leading figure in China, you must generally be related to the founding families of Maoist China, advance up the career ladder of local and regional governance with proven success, and adhere to Maoist-Dengist principles.

This creates a stable system of government manned by trustworthy and mutually loyal officials bound by family ties and shared ideology, in addition to a competent government staffed only by those capable of generating proven value according to objective ideological standards of success.

Compare this to the West, where a woman with two-years experience working at a gay rights NGO waves a dildo around, flashes her tits, and is suddenly elected to Parliament or even a Presidency. Or someone runs a comedy show and becomes very popular and is elected to the highest office. There is no collective vision or goal and everything is in discord, handed over to parasitic special interests who sponsor the circus, and reduced to utter vanity as citizens elect corrupt and incompetent officials to make a fashion statement or satisfy their irrational psychological manias and urges.

China expertly separates concerns. The people are given the economy and civil society to innovate, where they excel, and the experts and scholars vetted by the Party according to sound principles are given the State. Athens, a democracy, was conquered by Sparta, Macedon, and Rome. It is objectively the worst form of government and the West would never have survived Hitler if it weren't for Stalin.

So I long China.