/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18446927
because the dregs of society would rather have a giant tax hungry government controlling their lives and giving them scraps of gibs than make something of themselves

>>18385544
yeah, ancapland won't be able to exist without a significant population of rational, intelligent people who use their power as individuals to self-regulate and be responsible, creating no need for a state. I freely admit this unlike a lot of believers in other radical ideologies who think they can start a le epic revolution, behead a few people, and their magical fantasyland will become reality

>>18131708
Keynes has won the popular thought of policymakers for decades now, which means future civilization loses. it's only a question of when the music finally stops

>>18005849
the only bureaucrat i would forgive for violating my NAP

>>17960860
I am worried that the floods of low IQ spics that Trump said he would stop but didn't are going to slowly turn the US into the same socialist shitholes they are fleeing from. Bernie's biggest voter base was spics. What pro-capitalist EU countries do you recommend? Might have to move eventually

>>16532687
\Starts with
>It is all bullshit
Ends with
> It is all a lie.

This ladies and gentelmen is how you make fake news a manipulate , the construction of rhetoric and words placement, this is almost like a spell that works on a subconcious level. he starts and ends with saying its a lie. PSYOP irl

BTC will colapse at the nest halving .
It will starve (no TX no fees for miners> no miners no Hashpower no hashpower>no stable protocol security>)
You've been warned ₿itCoin will rise from the ashes.

>>16140339
they shouldn't be able to stop him from doing whatever with the donuts he already bought, but they should certainly be able to refuse to sell to him in the future, as should any party be able to choose not to engage with another party in trade

>>15559498
true capitalism cannot exist alongside government, because thanks to lobbying and corrupt regulations and loopholes, it always morphs into corporatism

>>13341774
blocking your path isn't an initiation of aggression against you, so the NAP would only be violated once you initiate violence in response