/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15761877
>You can ignore all the evidence
>Never posts any evidence

No matter what, you never actually prove anything you claim. You just always try and weasel around ever having to actually provide proof of what you are conjecturing.

Now bump my thread you thirsty bitch unless you have anything of value to provide to back up your claims.

>>15761934
>definitely didnt run out of money like the insider claimed
Wheres the source? Wheres the insider? Screencap? Posts? Anything? I've waited for 3 threads for you to prove any of it faggot. Now bump my thread. You've spent 14 responses but never once substantiated your claims, so you're just a hollow fucking FUDDER who's sole purpose in life is to bump my thread. Now do it.

>>15749168
>An "insider" who hasn't come forward in 2 years and that you have not proof of their statements and claimed things without sources
>The team refused to discuss some bullshit allegations that the SEC never corroborated
>The whole community abandoned a sub-8 million MC during a massive BTC crash
>Why won't they address a bullshit allegation of them trading shit that their butthurt ICOs tried to pin on them because their coin was getting fucking in the crash!?
>Where did the money go that I can't prove is gone!?

Whats my opinion? I have one because I wasn't there to lose like you ICO losers did. Again, all you do is ask question and fill in the gaps with your own conjecture and assumptions ad infinium.

You can try and use anacdotals of Google or Microsoft or whatever or make claims that you know the exact size of their staff from your Linkedin screenshots, but again, you never have concrete proof. You never have anything to bridge the gap between your accusation and reality, and so you're endlessly just flailing at the dark trying to prove a negative.

Now go on, say i'm vile and evil for not being sympathetic to your plight, I'll still be up and project is still succeeding regardless of how many conspiracies you put out.

>>15749270
Pays good that I bought at the bottom before all these partnerships and growth while you ICO faggots are weighed down and still haven't broken even.

>>15469223
Dude, Why go with a Journalist when you could call the SEC? You have your "facts", so do it. You have all the right and power in the world to do it. But you don't, why is that? Why do you not want the whistleblower prize?

You keep hyping up this journo with no name who is gonna do something, when you could call the SEC right now.But you don't, its hilarious.
You're fucking getting the neighborhood watch grandma to check up on something when you could call the cops. Its almost like you don't have proof of what you claim outside of your speculation.

>>4352413
AHAHAHAHHAH

holy fuck, thank you so much anon for holding my bags. I was one of the people who memed and flipped that shit for a 8x off of 1 sat back in the day.

Thank you, that was my first investment and helped me to getting to where I am today at a x120 my original ROI.