[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.18705524 [View]
File: 73 KB, 560x315, 1ne9ll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18705524

>>18705419
Haha thanks. I'm gonna keep going. Wish I discovered this 10 years ago.

>> No.18652277 [View]
File: 73 KB, 560x315, 1ne9ll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18652277

$30 footjobs? I'd be calling her every day.

>> No.18613846 [View]
File: 73 KB, 560x315, 1ne9ll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18613846

Who was that negro boy who invested in bitconnect and tons of people lost money? I can't remember his name but I would like to laugh and cringe at the videos. Thanks.

>> No.18603861 [View]
File: 73 KB, 560x315, 1ne9ll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18603861

>>18603800
"I threw all that shit in the lake"

>> No.10329692 [View]
File: 76 KB, 560x315, IMG_2901.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10329692

Why is it that financiers and software companies make so much more money than the verticals that they service? I know the answer is supply and command, but how is it that you can have (for example) someone just trading commodity futures making more money than the commodities themselves actually sold for? Is there actual value being provided, or is it really just a case of zero sum betting with winners and losers? Is there any literature which speaks to the effect of this sort of zero sum exchange and how it seems to interfere with the efficient market hypothesis?
>t. Slacker at second-tier college who probably should have failed all four of his economics courses

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]