/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11644549
>you operate like a fucking psycho. Seriously the saddest person on the internet
You spammed that line all the time when you were a heavy bagholder in bitconnect, right? Why did you listen to the Italian scammers pushing their schitcoin nano with the utterly incompetent management team that can do nothing right? Your shitcoin has had insane node problems since 2014, and you always have been promised that "soon" this structural problem will be fixed. Pic related. Good luck with that sad and psycho nanoids.

>>11435045
Have you managed to have at least 2 months without severe node crashes and frozen accounts on trading platforms? Many years ago it was promised that sooooooon, the node problems would be fixed, pic related.

>>11429524
Have you managed to have at least 2 months without severe node crashes and frozen accounts on trading platforms? Many years ago it was promised that sooooooon, the node problems would be fixed, pic related.

>>11393209
>NANO has the best tech in crypto
Have you ever had two months without constant node crashes, and deposit/withdrawal closed on exchanges?

This is a good comment:
you cant just create value out of nothing, the users make bitcoin worth something, all nano has is fleeting tech. there are hundreds of coins with tech better than nanos, and every new coin that comes out after it can have tech just as good if not better too.

the alt cycle is killing alts like nano every day, alts that never get traction because theres 20 new alts coming out every month, the speculators have no allegiance to alts like nano, and users just don't exist for temporary platforms like it.

and if that wasnt bad enough, nano has its own set of problems like a complete broken distribution abused by pajeets farming captchas getting millions of coins. nobody is going to treat nano as being a valuable coin, its just yet another play alt to pump and dump and then move onto the next thing.

there's no scarcity in these temporary alts, so long term their value is literally zero.
>>11203303

A little ever one month ago ALL major exchanges was down for weeks, due to node problems and crashes. Last week we had another node crash with another failed upgrade: https://medium.com/nanocurrency/weekly-nano-update-9-17-18-834f3a493994

Pic is comment from lead dev, promising all node problems will be fixed very soon. Comment was made in 2014...

It's a 2014 shitcoin that got pumped and dumped on a fraudulent exchange and reddit became obsessed with this scam spamming how its NEW TECHNOLOGY

Its a broken shitcoin that has never worked correctly on exchanges

Post your face when this shit coin has been broken on exchanged for 4 years and they do a rebrand to get away from that and bitgrail and they STILL have issues today

Selling my $1 bags for $20 felt good

>>9076235
>"it's the exchange not the coin" ™
>Looks at bittrex, cryptopia, mercatox, bitgrail, kucoin, and binance.

Sure looks like it's just the exchanges and not with a flawed coin

>>9016008
>>9016072

Its so great you guys, the exchange issues will be fixed any minute I SWEAR

This technology is so GROUND BREAKING and so NEW, everyone else needs to play catch up

>>8972355
Tfw bought in at $1.20 and sold at $20 on the way down from ath

Also spaghetti exchange code lol

>>8908945
Heh just like the bittrex delist and cryptopia delist was bullshit. And the mercatox and bitgrail issues... Then the kucoin and binance issues

I see you're new to raiblocks (now known as nano btw) was known as an exchange killer with its spaghetti exchange api code.

Don't worry, the pic shows the dev is working hard to fix it!

Bitgrail update
Basically said it's the xrb's team fault and you have have to agree to not sue them to get your money back.
There were confirmed cases of double withdrawals on kucoin and binance.

Can you imagine the brainlets here that didn't buy in sub $1 and sell above $20

Too bad all the low iq brainlets refused to believe binance was priced in. I'm dreaming of the day that bomber convinces everyone the dev team is at fault for their shit exchange api for the missing xrb

>>7878727
Kek venmo doesn't have 3 years of known exchange issues. Don't worry, it's rumored bittrex will take their xrb wallet out of maintenance any minute now

>>7828874
What if the node really was the issue and the devs are retarded. This shitcoin will go straight to $0

Don't worry friends, all the exchanged these past few months are the exchanges trying to work with this SUPER NEW REVOLUTIONARY tech

>>7771463
>Just give it more time

How much time did it need to fix exchange node issues?

>>7756056
This my fellow baNANOs!

Blame the exchanges, they've had over 3 years to implement this new tech.

>>7748421
Ah yes, evolving product older than ethereum but has managed to do nothing all these years.

Exchange node issues took how long to fix?

>>7722336
It's the exchanges fault. They've had years to implement this new tech!

>>7704171
>>7704206
>bittrex issues
>cryptopia issues
>bitgrail issues
>mercatox issues
>kucoin issues
>binance issues
>"it's the exchange not the coin" ™

>>7701870
Oy vey you can trust the exchanges!

Colin had it all figured out years ago. If exchanges can't handle this new tech they shouldn't fail to break even by listing it.

>>7675985
Yea I'm sure to miss the fast moving boat when they finally fix exchange issues