/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29551660
Nano and Iota bros might be on different sides of the fence, but we both appreciate the same concepts, even though they have different applications.

I do like fucking with them from time to time though.

>>28963912
Yea IOTA definitely has my attention, even if some of the community can be annoying, kek

NANO $1000 EOY

Because as we all know, Iota is centralized and had its blockchain frozen for an entire month after suffering a stolen.

Enjoy getting dumped on by the devs!

>>28136525
Remember that time IOTA had to freeze their network for a whole month? Pepridge Farm remembers.

>>27235514
>>27235509

>>26312530
Get fucked mohammad, the chad Aryan Nano is actually decentralized, and has never had its network frozen. Iota is a failed project.

LOL

https://hackernoon.com/iota-vs-raiblocks-413679bb4c3e

>Let’s picture a scenario where we reach 75 billion IoT devices by 2025. Let’s forget, to keep things simple, that there will be billions of people owning cryptocurrencies by 2025. Therefore, let’s also assume that these IoT devices own all the crypto (Skynet!?). Now, let’s make a few calculations. The average amount of crypto that will be shared among these future 75 billion devices will be on the order of 37 thousand IOTA (or 37 kIOTA) or 1.78 octillion raw RaiBlocks (or 1.78 kXRB). From this, we can see that there will be much more flexibility in the transactional sense for RaiBlocks than for IOTA. This leads me to think that RaiBlocks could very well dominate the IoT space in the coming years, unless IOTA upgrades their protocol to either increase the max supply or allow for divisible IOTAs.

Too bad NANO killed IOTA already. There is only room for one DAG. And NANO works NOW.

>>17281337

https://status.iota.org/

>Investigating stolen funds on Mainnet
>Currently the Coordinator is halted until further notice to investigate reported issues with stolen funds. We ask you to keep the Trinity wallet closed for now until further notice.

>February 14th 2020 - 09:50

>We have found the exploit and are now working on resolving the issue. As expected, the exploit is related to the (user-facing) Trinity Wallet. The IOTA core protocol is - as already communicated before - not breached.

>We know that you would like to understand more details, but ask you to refrain from questions towards the Community Moderators due to the parallel ongoing coaction with law enforcement. The teams are currently developing the mitigation strategy. We will share all details about the exploit in due time and (of course) publish a complete incident analysis as well.

THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE TRUE DAG
THERE CAN ONLY BE NANO