/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57941926
We live in a clowns world, but the problem is that we're not the main show. As already mentioned, no AI in the name, we're also not a dog meme coin...

aiExec
Really Long Corgi

>>57719708
Anywhere from 17.4k$ to 87k$.

>0 users
>digital dog shit
>2017 shit coin
>french academic pump and dump ponzi scheme
>digital dog manure

3.34$ price per token. Imagine what the price will be after the public worker pools come out?

We're hitting at least 3$ this month, if not 4.5$

>digital manure
>0 users
>AI & DePIN narrative

What more do I need to tell you frens?

We're going to at least 3$ and up to 4.5$ this month anons. Easy gains

Another day, another dime

What the fuck is wrong with you assholes? Can't we be frens?

>>29328278
No one. It's like LINK pre-adoption

>>29328289
>for the data details there used to be metadata like a description and preview but I'm not sure if its still implemented

Fair point, but how could I ever TRUST the meta data?

For intance, even if someone is selling me cat data. Imagine we have a table of 1 million rows and 15 different cat related atributes in each row. Le'ts now imagine that 10 atributed are actually cat related and the other 5 are complete garbage and just thrown in there so it looks like it's more data than there actually is... So you could manipulate people into thinking that you have more cat data than someone else who is also providing a cat data related data set

>>29328295
You obviously don't know what iExec RLC does and can do. NEXT! The question I'm asking has nothing to do with the data processing part

>>29328430
Again, I'm not asking about the execution part. I'm asking about the part where people offer you their data, so you can lend it out. HOW DO YOU KNOW IT'S ACTUALLY CAT DATA, NOT DOG DATA?

>>28107694
based nice job

>check biz
>ctrlf+f iexec
>0 results
>ctrl+f rlc
>0 results
Let's fix this. DOTB soon.

>>27335772
Based. Green ID too. I think we are gonna make it.

I really do feel like 2021 will be RLC's year to shine. All the enterprise adoption coming is so fucking bullish for this project.

Heh... Looks like Jakarta is back on for EOY 2021 boys... I'll see you in the VIP room ;)

>>26270824
Based FUCK NOILERS

>>26042999
Checked
Feeling stable

>http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Interoperability_C4IR_Smart_Contracts_Project_2020.pdf
ctrl+f "avalon"
The WEF paper, which is definitely bullish for LINK, is also somewhat bullish for RLC. In the paper, it mentions hyperledger avalon in the offchain computing section. The paper actually talks about the need for off-chain computing and TEEs a lot. Hyperledger Avalon is made up by a lot of groups, but one of the main contributing groups is iExec.
>https://www.hyperledger.org/blog/2019/10/03/introducing-hyperledger-avalon
"It’s also worth understanding a little of the project’s history to see how these communities came together. Avalon began as a reference implementation of the EEA’s Off-Chain Trusted Compute Specification, which sought to standardize how to farm out and reconcile workloads. Coming out of the EEA specification discussions, iExec was excited to build a heart disease evaluation prototype. iExec also immediately dove into building the Ethereum components for Avalon’s proxy model."

Who wrote the EEA’s Off-Chain Trusted Compute Specification? iExec:
https://entethalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/EEA_Off_Chain_Trusted_Compute_Specification_V1_0.pdf

Enterprise won't use blockchain if they have to put all data on chain. iExec's tech is NOT for NEETs who trade shitcoins. It is for enterprises that want to work on Ethereum, but don't want so much data on chain.
iExec is literally designing and writing the standards for the space. We are going to fucking make it boys.

>>24726394
congrats on making
>24th post
absolutely nothing, what a great guy!

>>24718310
Ok, look budy. Counter-argue it, if you can't you just look like the farmers hand you are. You need to somehow convince me you aren't retarded. So please, I will listen to every word you have to say and look at everything you'll show me. So please, indulge me. I WILL LISTEN

>>24494623
You don't deserve this, but here it is. eRLC is a fully compliant version of RLC for companies, approved by the AMF and soon by the SEC. You can use RLC, but it is not compliant for a company to use

>>24400470
>>24400389
>>24400323
Based fuck noilers

Just telling everyone that if RLC breaks $1.10, it is going to moon so fucking hard. Look at that chart. I am going to sleep now. When I wake up, I expect RLC to be up 40% or more.

>>23917441

WE
ARE
SO
EARLY

16.5k here

>>23792251
1k is a lot actually