/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15656444
>>15656530
These cucks only quote or defer to Satoshi whenever they can spin it in a way that is convenient to their narrative. When it comes to what Satoshi said about block limit, governance method, scaling, not changing the protocol and mining and node configuration, data centers, server farms and more they simply ignore it.

Snakes the lot of them.

>>14146161
LOL you don't even know what centralization means, you are parroting a dumb meme created by blockstream to justify them sabotaging Bitcoin.

>>14092781
Satoshi disagrees

>>13358438
>muh fee market / replace-by-fee
Newfag doesnt know how Blockstream devs claimed it was fatal to increase block size.

>>13043777

>>11823092
Hello stupid fuck, welcome to reality, pic related.

>>11474570
Chairman Mow says Bitcoin isn't for people earning less than $2 a day. With average transaction fees at $60, is Bitcoin even for people earning less than $100 a day?

https://www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2017/12/6/16743220/valve-steam-bitcoin-game-store-payment-method-crypto-volatility
No, Bitcoin was neutered useless (slow transactions and high fees) as currency.

>>11361178
>Moore

>>11349269
There is a limit to how big the blocks can be.
But that limit is

a) constantly rising with time (network infrastructure becomes more robust, hardware costs go down)
b) limited by how many humans there are.

A gigabyte block has been deployed and mined on the testnet. Even 128MB can rival Paypal scale.

>>10151333
NAA

Nick Szabo is a small blocker. Satoshi was not. You're retarded if you think it's him. All small blockers are absolutely fucking retarded. They're the Marxists of cryptospace, completely incapable of processing simple facts of reality.

>>9691844
BCH needed to alter the DAA to survive given the hijacking and social propaganda campaign of fuckheads like you, BTC massively diverged from the original plan by restricting on chain throughput to 13.33kbps forever, both are not the exact original plan for the product, but BCH is a damned sight than your hijacked piece of useless shit and you should kill yourself for being stupid enough to fall for it.

>>9563857
6) OK, it turns out that header first mining actually means that's wrong, but everyone needs to run their own full node to be sure the rules of the system are being followed. SPV was a mistake, it doesn't tell you the rules of the system are being followed, it tells you that you're on the chain which the miners vote for. And that is not Bitcoin. Bitcoin is whatever the developers of the bitcoin core node software define it to be and miners don't matter at all.
7) Yeah, ok, it's clear that our second layer is actually turning out like an unreliable shitty version of paypal, but we're going to accuse the other side of being a shitty version of paypal, because reasons
8) For fucks sake EVERYONE MUST RUN OUR SOFTWARE OR WE CANNOT DEFINE THE CONTENT OF THE BLOCKCHAIN, PAY NO ATTENTION TO BITCOIN CASH AND THE ORIGINAL VISION OF THE SYSTEM, THE REAL BITCOIN IS WHATEVER WE FUCKING SAY IT IS, SUCK OUR COCKS.
9) PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO USE THE NETWORK BITCOIN IS BEING ATTACKED
10) PEOPLE STOPPED USING THE NETWORK, THE NETWORK IS NOW USABLE AGAIN AND ANY CRITICISMS OF THE NETWORK ARE INVALID
11) WHAT DO WE HAVE TO FUCKING DO TO JUST MAKE YOU FUCKING OBEY US FOR FUCKS FUCKING SAKE DON'T YOU DARE SAY SATOSHI'S VISION OR PEER TO PEER CASH WE'RE GOING TO REWRITE THAT FUCKING PAPER THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS IS **WHAT WE FUCKING SAY** BOW DOWN AND WORSHIP.
In light of all this, the fact they have any support at all really illustrates just how fucking utterly retarded their supporters are. It's not like Bitcoin cash supporters are super smart, it's just that they're not completely brainwashed cultist zombies spewing constantly changing bullshit to justify obvious sabotage.

>>9503514
Do you somehow think that image proves you right? You realise that Satoshi's plan at scale was SPV wallets, which don't require running a full node? You realise that the whole core narrative on full nodes is simply complete bullshit? Well, I guess you don't, because otherwise you wouldn't be making a cunt of yourself.

>>9497572
> he doesn't know that the scale was worked out by Satoshi Nakamoto back in 2008, and core just artificially restricted it as an act of sabotage.
OK, naptime.