/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17394906
>least shilled fork by pajeets = worst
ngmi
>>17394912
The tax was going to be on BTC and BSV and yet it was gonna fund BCH. It was actually amazing, but it's not happening anyways, gtfo shill.
>>17394934
BCH lost the "real bitcoin" battle due to the Chinese being pussies, but it doesn't matter anymore. Real or fake, bitcoin is trash.
>>17394943
It's been BCH for a while breh, otherwise agree.
>>17395522
>t. pajeet
>>17395546
It pumps when calvin pumps BSV becahse BCH holders are stacked with BSV. It doesn't dump nearly as hard. It's the best of both worlds.
>>17395557
No split, just a bit of drama that's already over anyway.
>>17396020
>t. BSV shill
Hashrate has already proven willing to mine at a loss to protect BCH, even if it costs hundreds of millions. If you don't understand why that's bullish you're ngmi
>>17396048
this

Alright, fags.
I don't know why I'm doing this but I'm gonna give you good advice. You're gonna ignore it and I won't be bumping the thread, but here goes.

1. In a few hours Roger Ver will announce that a huge Japanese retailer will accept BCH (bch only) and will use bitcoin.com PoS terminals (funded by Roger). They will shill BCH to millions of normies by offering discounts. The news should pump BCH price. How much? Idk, I'm not a scammer, buy now, ride the pump, watch the graphs for a good exit.
2. After you exit go for ETH. Brainlets buy before good news so they can dump on it and there's a fork on January 16th. Ride this second pump and exit on January 14th.
3. After you exit, buy ZIL - the mainnet is about to be launched, it will also pump. Exit end of January/early February.
...
4. Either buy LINK with the money (testnet soon) or buy yourself something nice.

CYA biz

>>12057213
He's not Satoshi.

>>12049303
L.

>>12041908

>>12039643
So everything makes perfect sense at a technical level when we're actually observing what happened. But it gets so much worse than that. Look at what the actors behind BSV are actually *doing*. Pic related, pushing for photo id for miners, having no issue at all with all the nodes in the world being in a single data center, etc.
Ironically every significant criticism that the BTC faction levelled at the original BCH faction is more readily applied to the BSV faction.
1) They honestly don't actually care if all the nodes are simply in one data center, which provides a transparent and obvious mechanism for the state to coerce them into doing whatever the state wants them to do.
2) Consequently they further don't care at all what the impact of block propagation across the world is, because it's all going to be in one data center, so of what consequence is it?
3) They really don't understand the actual technical challenges of scaling on chain, which although we have the hardware to handle, sure, we definitely don't have the software to handle. They really do think you can just naively increment a block size number and everything will magically work. (and this is now conclusively actually proven wrong)
4) The entire infrastructure and effort is literally owned by a single guy who very much appears to be acting as a state cat's paw.
5) They are radically technically incompetent, picking a rivalrous fight with everyone else in the BCH space and having been utterly defeated in every way in which it is possible to be defeated, and yet still waving around lawsuits and threats as if they had any impact in a decentralised global jurisdictionless space like this.

>>12027981
Are you craig? You sound like Craig.

>>12024509
Sure craig, get back to smoking Jimmy's pole mate. Nobody actually believes your shit and everyone knows the only ones that pretend to are paid 2k a week from nChain to do so.

>>12003531
You've been conned or you're trying to run a con. Either way. Stop.

And lastly a reminder of how the shitshow actually went down when push came to shove and CSW had to do something more than spout nonsense.

>>11940463
some great unintentional comedy.

>>11937943
You just saw a big node in BCH try to change the rules. They failed miserably, and were heavily penalised for their efforts, and they can't even use them to implement the changes they wanted to by force anymore. LN though? fuck all you can do about it, your topology guarantees those nodes in the center will process the bulk of tx volume, end of story, suck their dick and deal with it or fuck off.

>>11934054
Bchers slow bleeding it.
Why would they dump everything no matter the price now a volume resistance is in? They just cap it and offload their bags on people who don't understand BSV is shit and can never work. You have to sell through 2 mil plus of that at the market price just to *start competing* and being valued equally by the market.
This fork was a brainlet move, self exile and removing themselves from the stakeholder pool on BCH (which is what that pre fork initial massive dump was) and now all they're holding is the stupid brand obsessed parts of the stakeholder pool who will spend the next year asking "but it's Satoshi's Vision! Why isn't it going up?"

>>11932784
You shouldn't give a fuck that he has a personality disorder. Look at the other Muppets in the space? I'd take a hundred Craig's to ditch any one of the cancerous core dev fucktards.
You should give a fuck that he's incompetent though, because he's setting the direction for the project. And he *is* incompetent. He got his ass kicked so hard by BCH everyone who was neutral and waiting to take a position based on the results had an extremely clear winner.
BSV will fail because it's based in idiotic and irrational assumptions. It's poorly architscrdd and tryi g to accomplish things that have nothing to do with the actual original thing that made bitcoin useful. And that's all that matters at the end of the day. All it actually does is take away investors who are too stupid to see that.

>>11931413
> gonna pump past bch
> with 2m+ worth of roger and jihan bags in for the slow bleed that they will use to pump bch in turn.
Good luck with that.

>>11932023

>>11911713
you lost