/biz/ - Business & Finance

Just hit 64.65 CPS

You are like a little baby. Watch this.

>>29624847
Yes.

>>29595897
Explain. I think we are in the same boat, but please do go on.

>$6.00

Looks like my work is done for the night. Same time tomorrow :)

feeless
instant
decentralized
no inflation
fully distributed
green and eco-friendly

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKt9KepQQF4
You will use the Nano, and you will be happy.

>>29453948
feeless
instant
decentralized
no inflation
fully distributed
green and eco-friendly

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKt9KepQQF4

You will use the Nano, and you will be happy.

>>29406599
BSV relies on centralized supernodes. While this may be one of the more effective attempts at solving the cryptocurrency trilemma, it leads us back to the same situation as with centralization.

I think the best system will be closer to Nano or Avax. Perhaps even something we haven't seen yet. But there needs to be a balance between decentralization and performance. Currently, everything is simply an experiment in governance. And to be quite frank, I don't think Blockchain is it.

>You and a super intelligent snail both get 1 million dollars, and you both become immortal, however you die if the snail touches you. It always knows where you are and slowly crawls toward you. What's your plan?

Bitcoin Average Transaction Fee
20.17 USD/tx for Feb 17 2021
>https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_fee

Ethereum Average Gas Price
173.35 Gwei for Feb 17 2021
>https://ycharts.com/indicators/ethereum_average_gas_price

ERC20 Transfer $23.78 $26.27 $28.27
Uniswap Swap $73.18 $80.84 $86.97
Uniswap Add/Remove LP $64.03 $70.74 $76.10
>https://etherscan.io/gastracker

>>28911662
yea that image really should be updated lmao

>>28892430
Natrium is a wallet. (http://natrium.io)

You can get free nano from a faucet. Alternatively, post your Natrium wallet address here and I will send you some for free to play with. Send whatever you receive back and forth between two wallets and you will get the picture of what Nano is capable of. Alternatively, watch this video instead.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKt9KepQQF4

>>28768025
SUBMIT

>>28756712
>He thinks BTC can scale

>>28664487
absolute fucking legend tier

HBAR is based and is a super good hedge against ETH. For the same reason NANO is a super good hedge against BTC.

Neither BTC nor ETH can scale to meet the economy at large. Furthermore, it is improbable for a network like ETH to ever scale and function at competitive prices (vs. centralized solutions). It is simple math, as for a ledger type system such as this, the same data needs to be rebroadcast by thousands of different nodes, and as the ledger grows, as does the amount of data broadcast. What this means is an ever increasing cost and delay per tx as the network grows. Layer 2 solutions are like bandaids and simply centralize the service. The only way to ever get blockchain tech available to the world at large, is by reducing the cost, ledger growth, and delay by as much as physically possible on the base layer. Nano does this by sacrificing all functions besides smart contracts. HBAR does this through a bit of initial central nodes, which imo makes it only semi-decentralized, however I truthfully think it is one of the only solutions for scaling a network that is supposed to function like ETH.

As soon as I can sell this Avax I will be swapping it for 100k HBAR or so as to compliment my legacy blockchain killer stack.

>>28537123
based. nothing good ever happened without a bit of blood shed

>>28139255
Depends on your definition of shill. I have been holding and telling everyone I know about Nano since it was Raiblocks. But I am entirely self invested. No one is paying me, rather I make close to $700 per every cent NANO goes up in value. I think I am in the top 200 wallets as well.

>>28139739
Imagine substituting verification with thematic ideology. As if trends were not just patterns that are as valid one moment as they are invalid the next. I don't expect you to understand this comment.

Stop buying memecoins and read whitepapers, learn funamentals.

Or just save yourself a lot of effort and buy NANO.

>>27414147
I mean the governing councils and associated corporations like Google aligned with Hedera are definitely worth mentioning, but that isn't what makes me interested in HBAR. I just see something like it as an inevitability due to scaling issues inherent in traditional blockchains. Examining the technicals of the situation suggests to me that a system like ETH will never be able to scale without being rebuilt from the ground up, and for another system to surpass ETH, it will most likely have to make some sacrifices. I find the sacrifices made by HBAR to be acceptable, if not even a superior approach for the end game of the crypto experiment, as IOT, M2M micropayments, and censorship resistant media and apps become the standard for content that is deemed controversial or subject to wanting to be censored/controlled.

ETH and BTC are proof of work experiments in my mind. Like 56k. The world demands no wasted time or resources. To think we, as an ever increasing, exponentially growing population, can bypass this demand is outright foolish.

>>27410478
Not until Nano flips BTC. I have vermin to kill... Huge ones.

$1000 EOY is FUD

>>26953018
One of the smaller denominations will likely be called Rai, whichever one ends up being closest to the dollar when everything is priced in I imagine. By that point, you won't find too many people who can even afford a whole Nano. So your wish may end up being granted.

LTC has the same fate in store that BTC does. Lattice type blockchain networks are the inevitable conclusion to the crypto experiment.

>>25835976