/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14400403
2GB blocks, instant transactions, proveably the way bitcoin was supposed to scale, I'm thinking it's BSV

>imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $50
>imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $100
>imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $150
>imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $200
>imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $250 <---- You are here
>imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $500
>imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $1,000
>imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $10,000
>imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $100,000

People who bought the real Bitcoin under $50 will be regarded as geniuses a couple of years from now

1. Low fees
2. Ability to scale
3. Adoption

Everything that BTC doesn't have

>Imagine not buying the original bitcoin under $50
>Imagine not buying the original bitcoin under $100
>Imagine not buying the original bitcoin under $200
>Imagine not buying the original bitcoin under $300
>Imagine not buying the original bitcoin under $1000
>Imagine not buying the original bitcoin under $10,000
>Imagine not buying the original bitcoin under $100,000

>>14011522
>and don't kid yourself if onchain scaling proven to work people won't just adopt your fork they will demand the actual valuable chain to adopt large blocks. you are speculating on literal tulips with sv.

If Blockstream suddenly decided to become big blockers (they never will because they are paid to cripple bitcoin but lets imagine they do) they are starting with 1mb blocks and 2008 node software, scaling and optimisation takes a long fucking time and nChain with BSV have years of headstart

Compare:
The biggest block mined on BSV is 128mb on mainnet & 1.423gb on testnet.
The biggest block mined on BCH is 32mb.
The biggest block mined on BTC is 1mb, literally.

It's capitalism, not some socialist system where we all have to sit down and wait for the "official" (not official) chain to begin scaling, one chain will win and all others will lose. If you don't understand this you deserve to lose your money.

Reminder there will only be one coin in the end and it will be what Satoshi Nakamoto envisioned

>BTC is now a store of value
>BCH is a currency and a store of value

This is nonsense, how can something with no value be a store of value?

There can only be one Bitcoin, all others will fail, those that will fail have no value

BTC will lose because the network is crippled, it can never properly be used as originally intended, and the Lightning Network is fundamentally broken and useless

BCH will lose because it would get shut down if it ever took off, data sig verify makes it illegal, it's as simple as that

BSV will win because it has the highest utility and is the only Bitcoin that is legal and companies will adopt, the protocol is set in stone unlike BTC and BCH to ensure stability for 100+ years

>2030
>Bitcoin SV is the dominant chain
>1 terabyte+ blocks
>millions of transactions per second
>$0.00001 tx fees
>network is run on supercomputers
>global arms race to develop efficient energy production and ever faster computing power to mine the blockchain

>2030
>Bitcoin Segwit is the dominant chain
>1mb blocks
>7 transactions per second
>$10,000 fees
>network is still run on rapsberry pies
>no incentive to improve the network

Which future do you want?

APOLOGISE