/biz/ - Business & Finance

Cryptocurrency as whole is barely into the early adopter phase.

>>20289888
Gem in innovator stage on verge of early adoption.

>LN was poorly implemented
I don't see how Lightning will take off beyond a hobbyist phase without massively centralized interests getting involved.
>Stakenet designed an ecosystem that takes what Bitcoin implemented for LN and makes extraordinarily powerful use of it
Stakenet's solution is notable for embedding LN nodes into masternodes so the LN nodes have access to all the collateral locked in the MNs (quasi-centralized liquidity pool within a purely decentralized network). The nodes will be running 24/7 in the background atop all that liquidity to rout payments and should take very little maintenance to keep up.

It could very well solve multiple problems in the industry by meshing the gears of many underutilized together.

Lightning?
>Lack of liquidity. Not profitable enough at the individual level.
Staking?
>Inflationary. Sometimes to an extreme. Underutilized use-case outside of securing the integrity of the network.
DEXs?
>Low liquidity, low volume, paper-thin orderbooks, AND difficult to access for 99.9x% of the world.
Atomic swaps?
>A big win for DEXs but still potentially very slow depending on which coins are being swapped.
Masternodes?
>Like so many staking coins, what do they do other than secure the integrity of the network and inflate the circulating supply?

Using m a s t e r n o d e s and the collateral locked within them to power L i g h t n i n g A t o m i c S w a p s which serve as the infrastructure for what could very well become the speediest and most liquid D E X in the industry and using a conservative inflationary supply to gradually produce more m a s t e r n o d e s which, in a way, provide an opening to expand the exchange with additional servers so it doesn't hit a bottleneck. It's both genius and shocking that no one in crypto seems to even know that it exists.

>>20120824
>been making the DEX since 2016 but theyve only been around since 2019
Your FUD sucks so much it's almost like you want everyone to read it and accumulate XSN, as true patricians do.
Raiden will unironically push this into early adoption. You might be better off buying now than trying to FUD it back down like the anons at 1k and 700 sat did.
XSN sat on the market extremely undervalued for a long time. Just in the past 2 weeks, it has sent enough of a shockwave through the industry already to be deeply re-evaluated and noticed by people in high places.
The market cap is very small and the potential payoff is vast. Old biz knows. Whales know. Even FUDders know.

>>20065699
Checked.
>Liquidity sink. Aggregates from an unlimited number of exchanges so customers can see the fairest fees and market prices.
>Allows one to trade on these exhanges without an account or KYC
>Native interop bridge between BTC and ETH via LN and Raiden, respectively. BTC/ETH Lightning swaps possible.
>Instant swaps between any LN/ERC pair
>Non-custodial. Always keep your funds.
>MNs that make passive income off of exchange fees
>CCPoS that allows for rewards paid out in XSN to be directly and immediately swapped into anything in the ecosystem (run MN, earn income in BTC, LINK, or USDC)
>>20065713
I'm literally testing swaps on the DEX right now
>>20065758
>selling .00000001 XSN before 2021
Hard pass.

>>20051322
Checked. This is a shock evaluation and it's early in a bull cycle. Raiden integration and launch coming shortly. XSN could only fly under the radar for so long. Relatively speaking, we're still underground. Not for long.
I don't believe we've reached the end of the innovator stage just yet, but we're damn close to the fault line between it and early adopters.

>>19980983
Considering how massive these accomplishments will stack up to be for the entire industry and how much room it has to grow beyond the innovator/early adoption phase?
More than likely, it will turn into a seller's market and demand will only increase as the network builds up it's utility.
>>19980996
>>19981032
100k is fair.
>>19981204
based