/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15878424
What does it matter if it is required or not required? The fact that the entire discovery process was detailing the plaintiffs and the defendants involvement in the creation of Bitcoin and this served as the entire basis for the case in the first place is proof that the judgment was about the Satoshi mined Tulip coins. There is no dispute over this, all parts in the lawsuit agree.

But nice try at obfuscation.

>>15587982
>The judge never ruled he is Satoshi!
>Do you not trust the judges judgment that he is Satoshi?

Can't have it both ways shill, lmao. Consult with your blockstream supervisor how to avoid conflicting talking points when doing the shill rounds.

>>14827115
>>14827175
Cope