/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24176008
Fair enough.
I did not account for retards and illiterates when writing this lmao

>>22328398
Hmmmmmmmm./.......

>>20919370
There was a huge influx of new people back in January because of /wsb/. But we dont really have much conflict with them and most new fags lost all their money and left by July.

Id argue /pol/ and permabears are more cancerous.

>>20128221
I thought about putting in a few % of my money into it. I think even Graham suggested doing so.
Any good ETFs?
GDX, RING?

>>18831453
I mean they have zero corona problems because they have no profits but huge amounts of money.
>>18831455
>But other countries would
Whats your point? Im not saying that obscure Belgian companies are safe, I argue that some companies are too big, too important and too connected to the state too fail.
In the US that would be LMT and some others.
In Europe Airbus or BA.

These companies will only fail when the countries backing them fail.
> and last I checked air france isn't an american national airline.
The ability to have a company too big to fail is not exactly an American one.
KLM-AF, Lufthansa are so connected to their countries and Europe that they can not be allowed to fail.