/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20817461
Here is another example.

Before anyone brings it up, no hydrogen doesn't make sense for long haul trucking either. 93% of trucks carry loads that weigh less than the weight of a full electric truck battery. Hydrogen is never going to take off. It takes millions of dollars to build a hydrogen fueling station, electricity is available almost anywhere.

>>20687467
>hydrogen is in my opinion thr best solution for trucks in the future
Well you're wrong. It takes around three times more energy to power hydrogen trucks compared to battery electric and there is almost no existing infrastructure for them, unlike electricity which is found almost anywhere and just needs chargers put in. Trevor Milton gets around this fact by lying about the cost of energy and their hydrogen stations.
>>20687586
A 100% move in your cherry picked penny stock is nothing, they still move like that all the time because of how much volatility they carry. My return in the last four months has been around 200%, I would have lost money if I 'invested' in FPX. It's unlikely that any junior nickel miner will outperform QQQ long term. How much of the recent pump came from Elon Musk's comments about nickel? That isn't sustainable.