/biz/ - Business & Finance

Guys, HBAR is already massively over-valued. It's over 1 billion market cap.

This is NOT LINK in 2017, what are you people smoking?

>>25341069

If she doesn't have a real vagina, how do you even have sex with a tranny?

>>23458310

Impressive.

>My cost average 12

Considering buying PNK for the first time in my life.

Been holding ETH and BTC and some Tellor so far. Tell my why this will outperform any of those?

This seems popular on /biz/.

>>22008253

>that really think $3000 is possible

That's still less than HALF of LINK's current marketcap. Take your FUD back to Rebbit.

>>21328911

Didn't their product literally just get replaced by an actual working crypto invoicing system developed and patented by Square?

>>21154090
>>21154159

Let's see your active position.

>>20666246

So WHERE IS the fucking Google partnership?

Simple question, right?

Anyone have any idea why it's actually pumped 5x in the last few weeks?

>>16231602

This.

At this stage, with all of the Reddit niggers, women and actual niggers involved with LINK, and the low IQs on /biz/, none can still think that this is the next big thing...

LINK already had a golden bullrun, it was $4.00.

>>15236525

What's your take on the BBC?

>>14859864

>Think about how much money he and we will make when he sees this through.

He's a literal billionaire, what incentive is there for him to continue developing some bullshit software surrounded by a bunch of faggots?

>>14468335

Reading the White Paper, they want to be a stablecoin?

Their chances are slim considering the crowded field of competitors. Why would anyone buy their stablecoin instead of a recognized name like Coinbase?

Sorry lad, seems flakey. Not to mention I don't know any of those people, where their funding comes from etc.

Gonna pass on this for more LINK.

>>7793326

>Doesn't do any due diligence before "investing" his own money

>When others points out OBVIOUS flaws and signs of fraud, he shits himself and accuses people of FUD

I hope you one day wake up to these melodious words:

>HEY HEY HEEEEYY

>>7759694

Well, the project has a lot of technical challenges. Personally, I'm going to wait until the end of 2018 to see if they can pull off most of their road map. The White paper is a little lacking in details on how they plan to accomplish the various goals.

The most important deliverable is the settlement between FIAT and crypto. If they can overcome the technical challenges, then this will probably become a top 5 project valued in the billions.

At least we're not the Omise faggots with an entirely fraudulent team of marketers who are scrambling to hire some programming talent, and totally behind on their promises despite being valued at 1.5 billion and not having anything to show for it.

>>7037191

I'm not saying I do.

But people like Buffett and Klarman can. They literally call up a company and go talk to them and go through their 10K filings for a decade back with a fine-tooth comb.

Value investing requires, tough, diligent investigation and enormous self discipline.

This is only the beginning lads.

Welcome to the new floor, $1.00

$5.00 by Main net.

>>5691808

Do you think those people are still alive?

I always wonder about the fates of those damned souls that don't make it. We see the winners on the front page, but where are the others?

>>5665982

That's actually a pretty elaborate and cynical scam as far garden variety Pajeet Poo Pyramids go.

>>716473

>Geology

>Shit tier

Well it's a combination of the disciplines of chemistry, physics and computer science, but oh well, fewer candidates and more lucrative jobs for me I guess.

Good luck finding work in aerospace or nanocucknology.