[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:

View post   
>> No.18160455 [View]
File: 91 KB, 1050x988, 1585446793110.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18160455

Exhibit C is showing how linkies blatantly lie about their shilling points. Did you know linkies' only reason for why a LINK token will be in the $1000 range is collateral, yet the word collateral is nowhere to be seen in the whitepaper? Here one shill getting completely btfo in his tech shilling by another coder

>> No.18159701 [View]
File: 91 KB, 1050x988, 1585446793110.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18159701

Exhibit C is showing how linkies blatantly lie about their shilling points. Did you know linkies' only reason for why a LINK token will be in the $1000 range is collateral, yet the word collateral is nowhere to be seen in the whitepaper? Here one shill getting completely btfo in his tech shilling by another coder

>> No.18158963 [View]
File: 91 KB, 1050x988, 1585446793110.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18158963

Exhibit C is showing how linkies blatantly lie about their shilling points. Did you know linkies' only reason for why a LINK token will be in the $1000 range is collateral, yet the word collateral is nowhere to be seen in the whitepaper? Here one shill getting completely btfo in his tech shilling by another coder

>> No.18158597 [View]
File: 91 KB, 1050x988, 1585446793110.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18158597

Exhibit C is showing how linkies blatantly lie about their shilling points. Did you know linkies' only reason for why a LINK token will be in the $1000 range is collateral, yet the word collateral is nowhere to be seen in the whitepaper? Here one shill getting completely btfo in his tech shilling by another coder

>> No.18158356 [View]
File: 91 KB, 1050x988, 1585446793110.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18158356

Exhibit C is showing how linkies blatantly lie about their shilling points. Did you know linkies' only reason for why a LINK token will be in the $1000 range is collateral, yet the word collateral is nowhere to be seen in the whitepaper? Here one shill getting completely btfo in his tech shilling by another coder

>> No.18157760 [View]
File: 91 KB, 1050x988, 1585446793110.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18157760

Exhibit C is showing how linkies blatantly lie about their shilling points. Did you know linkies' only reason for why a LINK token will be in the $1000 range is collateral, yet the word collateral is nowhere to be seen in the whitepaper? Here one shill getting completely btfo in his tech shilling by another coder

>>18157748
>post from 2018

>> No.18157315 [View]
File: 91 KB, 1050x988, 1585446793110.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18157315

Exhibit C is showing how linkies blatantly lie about their shilling points. Did you know linkies' only reason for why a LINK token will be in the $1000 range is collateral, yet the word collateral is nowhere to be seen in the whitepaper? Here one shill getting completely btfo in his tech shilling by another coder

>> No.18156843 [View]
File: 91 KB, 1050x988, retarded linkies.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18156843

>>18156774
Exhibit C is showing how linkies blatantly lie about their shilling points. Did you know linkies' only reason for why a LINK token will be in the $1000 range is collateral, yet the word collateral is nowhere to be seen in the whitepaper? Here one shill getting completely btfo in his tech shilling by another coder

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]