/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56982494
>No
Anon!

>>54891854
All of Friday's price action was bullshit. I'm going back to bed.

Thursday approaches
Red lines

>Brokers
https://pastebin.com/F1yujtVq

>Stock market Words
https://pastebin.com/VtnpN5iJ

>Risk Management
https://pastebin.com/sqJUcbjp

>Educational Sites
https://www.investopedia.com/
https://www.khanacademy.org/economics-finance-domain
https://nhentai.net/tag/deflation/

>Free Charts
http://www.tradingview.com
https://www.finscreener.com/

>Screeners
https://finviz.com/
https://www.tradingview.com/screener
https://etfdb.com/

>Pre-Market Data and Live Data
https://www.investing.com/indices/indices-futures
https://finance.yahoo.com/
https://www.msn.com/money

>Bio-pharma Catalyst Calendar
https://biopharmcatalyst.com

>Boomer Investing 101
https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Getting_started

>Dividend Reinvestment (DRIP) Calculator
https://www.dividendchannel.com/drip-returns-calculator/

>List of hedge fund holdings
https://fintel.io/

>Misc
https://squeezemetrics.com/monitor
https://market24hclock.com/
https://tradingeconomics.com

>>21632957

>>18133003
According to basic tenets of TA in regards to volume, a falling average volume along with rising trend is bearish. The same is true of falling volume along with falling trend for bullish indicator.

But questions: are you ballsy enough to short over the weekend when all kinds of news can potentially happen to cause a gap up on Monday? Or are you confident enough to figure the balance of news will inevitably be negative? Personally i think risk is too great. I'm all cash for the weekend.

>>17621724
True. The reason shorting the index is hard is you will be wrong 9/10 times. A sell/short signal for a little 3% dip looks identical to the sell signal for a mass panic red waterfall of pink wojaks. If you're really careful you can break even on those 9 wrong tries but it's an exercise in frustration to do it over and over for years before you get the good recession trend.

However, there's a higher percentage approach. Go long most of the time (swing trading) on index. Sell your sell signals as per usual but don't immediately go short. Go short if and only if your sell signal occurs on a lower high after initial rally. That's better odds. Speaking of which there is a possible short signal developing on the US indexes right now. It's a few days shy of the right parameters at least.

>>17295999
didn't they shut down a large amount of production for at least 4 weeks now?

>>16662273
>these are the people telling me telling me how finance works

>>15713785
These people don't understand what an agreement is, but the board has always been shit. It's only natural that something that'd capture the general public (in regards to demographics) after the bitcoin runup to 19k would be full of incredible lobotomites.
I have a personal theory that the entire millennial generation has a poverty mindset ingrained into them after the 2008 Financial Crisis. They saw their familes get broken up through divorce, they may have lost their childhood homes, and may have seen that happen to many friends and family members. It's why, despite unemployment being the lowest in decades, people complain about jobs. It's why these retards hate debt, even if it can benefit them. It's why they reject financial markets and wall street, even if "boomer methods" of investing would allow them to capture some gains from the greatest economy in the history of civilization.

I fucking hate /biz/

>>15316299
There is no official /smg/ stance. we have many different posters with all kinds of ideas

you have all the ZH doomers who have been calling for Armageddon since 2013
you have perma-bulls that think the stock market will pump forever

the truth is not the bear or the bull. the truth is the crab
there are serious structural issues with the economy right now: corporate debt, not much room for growth, demographic issues, consumer debt including student loans will slow down consumer spending. International economies entering a very challenging part of the cycle
at the same time, the fed and other market actors have new tools that were used in 2009 that they are ready to use again to keep the markets up so that all the boomers can retire

basically, don't count on a nice steady 10% annualized return over the next decade. It could happen, but from where we are it is extremely unlikely, even if the fed inflates asset prices
things will get rough but they won't completely fall apart. The economy isn't as fucked as it was before 2008, the demographic and consumer balance sheets have real issues but not enough that all the dominoes collapse at once.

basically the boomers have really fucked things up for the rest of us, but we just have to try and play it smart and soldier on. If we can keep things afloat until they start dying, then all we have to deal with are all the progressives and queers

Accumulate capital and learn more, as you said. Look for stable sources of yield. Buy strong revenue streams and don't get snibbed

>>15257355
Hey that's PNC
I think they do it yearly anyway right? (recalculate your payments based on excess principal paid, even if you don't call them)
I stopped paying excess principal and now I just hold extra cash or buy extra stocks -> my interest is under 4%, so I'm looking to try and outperform that

I have to pay like >2x your property taxes lol

>>15121825
doesn't matter who or what they blame when their growth stops and their banks fall apart and there is no food on the table
HK protests either get put down or they could spread mainland

If you've never studied Chinese history you should
but you might not have to, you'll see it all play out in real time
some things about China never change

>>15121839
if you were all in on TUP you'd be fine :^)

>>14937274
I also made u something ;)

>>14937348
You'll be fine, you can make it back with DOMSCUMM