/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19185317
wtf do you think capacity means?

>capacity a year ago 1,110 BTC
>now 904 BTC

This gay shit is failing, which makes perfect sense because all it does is lose people money.

https://news.bitcoin.com/mishap-sees-user-lose-30000-btc-on-lightning-network/

If you actually try and spend any amount over a few pennies there is a high chance your transaction will fail.

https://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2018/06/26/lighting-network-transactions/

Segshitters are unironically betting on this abortion of a network LMAO and all it does is allow banks to be a middleman in Bitcoin. You faggots are beyond retarded.

>>16557724
>well for starters that's not true unless you have a centralized trustful piece of shit chain.
True. I propagate blocks with my fucking laptop on BTC. Small blockers are superior in every way.

BTC is the most secure crypto on the fucking planet because most people who use it run a full node and it is full nodes that secure the network. Personally I can wait for a solution like Lightning if it means hodling gold!

>>14400726
>Use lightning
You tell'em, anon! Are you #wreckless too? I lost like 50 bucks this morning trying to route a payment, but that doesn't matter because its the future!

Name a better blockchain project than the Lightning Network. Protip: you can't.

How many of you cryptopedes are #reckless? What do you think of my keychain?