/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>4455993

>>4453143
Yeah. Don't buy LNK, its the next Confido. Exactly the same pattern except with less PR.

No Link thread for hours? Ok, lets have one, since everybody is desperately waiting for one.

Price predictions EoY?
Why is Link not moving and doing fucking nothing?
When can we have news?

Go!

>>4304441
hodl strong anon.

OK, Linklets, real talk time. I own well over 100k LINK and I am steadily losing confidence. I don't care about retarded memes, non argumentative FUD and whatever. I just want to have insightful discussions.

Also, I just can't fucking be arsed with the 50% swings and constant bleeding anymore. Literally every time Link made a move upwards, it was the better choice to just fucking sell and rebuy some days later. Everbody knows this, so nothing will move here. Same with the recent pump. Now only bleeding again so we start off where we have been. Holding is actually the biggest meme here, no matter how good the tech is. Despite all the talk only few seem to REALLY have confidence this is going somewhere. Otherwise it wouldn't get shorted all the time.

I want to understand this on a rational level. How is it possible that a project, that is already backed, endorsed and partnered by billion dollar industries including fucking SWIFT not making any serious moves, while OMG rises 100% when they put stickers on skateboards. I mean not even with ETH it was that clear how good the project is. Good news? Price drops more. No news? Price drops more. There are literally no bad news, no matter, price drops.

The FUD that really got to me is, that still nobody can explain why you need the token first of all. And second why the hell would anybody want the price to increase anyway, other than us holders and speculators. If the network needs Link tokens to work, you buy a few when you need them and then they get sold for profit by those who receive them. Why would the tokens ever increase to big levels? The value of the tech does not directly correspond to the value of the token in my opinion. From my understanding this means that LINK token won't really increase, no matter how many companies are going to adopt the system. No reason to artificially increase the price of the necessary resource if you can keep it low as well.

Or am I getting this completely wrong?

>>4258152
fuck off virgin

>>4250945
Stay poor nolinker

>>4183767
He is bulking

>>4167176
Let this be sign, the weak will be punished, they shall pay for their lack of faith.

>$100 by eoy

HULK IZ REDY

I cant wait to buy my white

L A M B O
A
M
B
O

>>4097981
hahahahahah faggot nice try, not selling my link bag to you!

Why would banks choose to pay fees using a low liquidity token to access an external node rather than create their own private node for a fixed cost?

Also I understand that banks also use open APIs but a bank could easily make an agreement that they will pay x dollars for y volume of any API and then store the node on an internal chain. Without ever needing to use Chainlink itself or it's token.

What is the banks incentive to use the token then?

>>4070146
LINK IS THE NEW ETH

$1 EOY

daily reminder that you need at least 5k lambolinks to be able to comfortably retire

>>4032677

>77
>green id

This truly kek’s chosen coin. Praise kek.

>>4032699
Check’d

>>4023811
Hello Mr.Chink

>>4023738
>>
We destruyt da Chinance

How many chainlinks do I need to run a node, and what do I get for running a node? Could I use any type of system to run a node?

GET OUT OF MY WAY CHINKS!

>>3986919
Please send me some scraps, dear linkbrother!

1Pymmd7pgPiBqW7vCkfstNeYoETiG6wZVD

>>3961620
i bought 2000 more today you cowardly faggots