/biz/ - Business & Finance

>run your own LINK node
>stake your own LINK for free
>stake your friends and families LINK for commission
>build a reputation for your node, stake strangers LINK for commission
Why aren't more people planning to do this?

>>15950783
Great. The next big happening or non-happening date to get excited or non-excited about.

Anyone else buy the dice?

yup that pretty much sums it up.

WHY ARE YOU STILL UP WAGECỤCK?
YOU HAVE TO GET UP EARLY TOMORROW FOR MR NOSEBERG

Weird question here biz.

My work will soon be switching over to a new time keeping system. Currently, as we have done since the place opened 12 years ago, and since i started there over 5 years ago, we use photo ids with rfid chips in them. They let us thru the various doors in the facility and also use to clock in and out thru our time clock/keeping system, Kronos.

They are switching over to biometrics and expect everyone to just give up their fingerprints.

Im wildly uncomfortable with this idea. Just dont want to do it.

Assuming when the time comes, and i refuse, what can i expect? I wont "quit", or walk out, or even sign anything saying i refuse. I just wont do it. Will they fire me for refusing? Will i be able to get unemployment?

fuck you dont remind me!

>>11170836
especially if btc dumps. .15 is a long shot 25 yeah but 15. I would not take that bet.

it would be nice if there was a way to use a smart contract to automaticly pay you btc if it reaches .15 cents. sad nothing like thay exsist in the real world.

>>11102161
This is why aggregation isn’t necessary for the network to launch. I was going to make a thread about it but I’ve been busy, but my hypothesis is that the reason Thomas has said they haven’t started on consensus/aggregation is because they don’t need to do it. The network is only to ensure the data sent/received is correct and not tampered with. Therefore, i think it’s possible chainlink is relying on the 3rd party partners to develop their own aggregation/consensus models for the network to use because a) it isn’t something chainlink should develop, and b) they’re the end user customers of those aggregation models which other companies will eventually use.

This also helps explain why chainlink has been so tight lipped about partnerships and relationships with companies: those companies are developing proprietary aggregation models to use when the network launches and don’t want their competitors to see what they’re working on. This also explains why Thomas said they don’t have any hidden coding repositories; because they don’t. The companies and 3rd parties chainlink is working with (docusign, DA, Microsoft, swift, etc.) are all developing consensus/aggregation models on their own to help build the network from a business perspective and probably have those models in their own, separate coding depositories.

Screencap this. Mainnet will launch before the end of 2018 and it will be revealed that all of these suspected “partners” are others developing their own industry specific aggregation and consensus systems because they all require separate and unique ones. Chainlink’s job is to ensure the data from api providers isn’t tampered with, and the companies’ job is to help aggregate the data for the smartcontract products/services they hope to offer their customers.
t. LTG
Hail Sergey

>>11080067

>>11066195
>No papers?
>Send him to the "Linkpool"

>>11056172