/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55123345
You know about sparks.foundation, right?

What are the LARPers going to do when anons start attesting their accomplishments without doxxing themselves?

>>54901247

Fuck you. The guy asked so I delivered. Why don't you share a recommendation with the same market cap-to-alpha ratio?

No seriously, do it.

>>54856265
Meh, don't really have to worry about that since I hold SPARK and any pullbacks are resolved by a new ATH a few weeks later.

Go to https://sparks.dev, scroll down and click the Telegram link, read the pinned messages. This is a microcap DAO project that is working on DID solutions that will allow users to verify themselves and attest credentials without doxxing. This is important because AI is going to create a lot of problems with bots and junk data. There are other projects tackling this too but they are saddled with VCs and bad tokenomics.

>>54353191
If you really want to position yourself ahead of the curve, think in terms of solutions to the inevitable problems that will be created as a byproduct of AI. Right now there is a microcap DAO called Sparks that is working on decentralized identifier middleware solutions that will allow users to selectively attest credentials without doxxing themselves. So far this is the only project I've come across that is grassroots and not mired in VCs and institutional actors

https://sparks.dev

Scroll down and visit the Telegram (and Discord), check the pinned messages in the TG. The tokens are being used to fund development, and if you look at the chart it will give you an idea of what to expect considering we're still firmly in a bear market.

>>54352551
https://Sparks.dev, scroll down to the bottom of the page and click on the Telegram, read the pinned messages. This will likely do well in excess of 100x during the next bull cycle, because AI is going to create problems with identity verification and Sparks is the only truly decentralized project that is tackling DID middleware solutions. No VCs or bad tokenomics, completely grassroots and you'll be surprised to see who's getting involved already.

Check out the Discord too, lots of collaboration happening. It's a DAO, after all.

"What then can escort us on our way? One thing, and one thing only: philosophy. This consists in keeping the divinity within us inviolate and free from harm, master of pleasure and pain, doing nothing without aim, truth, or integrity, and independent of others' action or failure to act. Further, accepting all that happens and is allotted to it as coming from that other source which is its own origin: and at all times awaiting death with the glad confidence that it is nothing more than the dissolution of the elements of which every living creature is composed. Now if there is nothing fearful for the elements themselves in their constant changing of each into another, why should one look anxiously in prospect at the change and dissolution of them all? This is in accordance with nature: and nothing harmful is in accordance with nature."

>>54331675

Sparks. Although at its current $1.24M market cap it will likely surpass 100x under the right conditions. They're a grassroots DAO who are developing an ecosystem of decentralized identifier (DID) solutions to the problems that AI will inevitably present.

>>54276132
it's sparks, peep image name. look at OP's image then look at sparks logo in picrel

Main trading pair is with USDC, hasn't skipped a beat despite all the SVB FUD. Hmm, wonder why?

I'll give you a hint: They're in talks with some major players in the space to help develop the Sparks ecosystem; bigger than you think.

I'm trying to help you guys without spoon-feeding you. It's up to you if you want to hop in the relevant channels and do 15 minutes of DD. At least you've been notified. Take care all.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsTlCIvoILc&t=132s

I saw that these fuckers are setting up a Cayman Foundation for the DAO and in talks with Red Squirrel to help develop it. I would like to see the chart turn bearish and was thinking that maybe if we could pile on every negative thing conceivable about this project that it might happen. Thanks bros.

It all comes down to identity.

This AI technology is Pandora's box. Quite soon, the internet will be saturated with illusion. Perfect AI speech, audio, and video synthesis will drown out reality. AI bots will flood social media. No one will be able to tell the difference between interacting with an AI machine or a real human online. Even telephone calls will become totally untrustworthy.

Predictably, government will seize upon the opportunity created by this dialectic chaos and attempt to impose its own centralized solution on the public: mandatory digital identity verification for everyone, at all times.

It’s about total information control.

For too long the Internet has acted as a double-edged sword. Its potential for anonymous user activity allows anyone at all to spread any thoughts, ideas, or information patterns that they please, with impunity. State secrets, “dangerous” ideas, “ludicrous” conspiracy theories. Misinformation and disinformation. Until now there has been no easy solution to these perceived problems. A federal, centralized, digital identity platform threatens to finally put an end to anonymity online, allowing the state to trace misinformation and other “dangerous” communications to their source.

The risk of abuse produced by the state’s monopolization of surveillance technologies in turn necessitates voluntary, open source, and decentralized alternatives that can verify user’s identity and credentials without compromising the individual’s basic right to privacy; the freedom to choose what you share with others. As such, Sparks represents an earnest attempt to provide choice and help resolve the demands of this nascent market. As a decentralized autonomous organization centered around a suite of privacy-enhancing utilities, the Sparks ecosystem offers participants the community and advantages afforded by a common ethos that enshrines encrypted-freedom at its core.

can't wait for people to say "I didn't buy at $0.008... I want to kill myself" gg also no curry muncher everest in my thread thanks.

We need to get creative with narratives that will cause existing holders to dump, and others to stay away.

>>53812971

OP, have you seen sparks.dev? It's the passion project of some eccentric tech4good developer that has been quite polarizing here on /biz/.

Might be worth looking in to.

...to help spread the narrative that this is a scam:

>dev is slow-rugging from multiple wallets
>hidden mint function
>fake partnerships
>vaporware
>ponzi
>whales dumping
>undelivered milestones
>dead volume, "we are the world", etc

Don't ask questions; just fucking do it.

>>53781136

Sparks. It's going to $30M+.

>>53780957

https://sparks.dev is worth your consideration.

>>53678323
If you want a serious answer?

Sparks.

>>53655815
>Sparks has entered the chat.

This will exceed expectations and gradually become a top community pick.

>>53640588
Sparks, it's a mid-to-long-term hold, but being that it's the middle of crypto winter, you'll probably pull 20-30x minimum with enough time and patience. Join the Telegram, check the pinned messages and interact with the dev.

You'll see what I mean.