/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19939782
You also forgot that Nano devs were pushing Bitgrail hard and linking them on their plebbit site, despite everyone knew something was very wrong with Bitgrail, plus constantly vouching for scammer bomber/Bitgrail. Pic.

>>16642820
Nano Foundation admitted guilt. You will not see this on plebbit or hear it from the fraudulent Nano Foundation:

Brola’s lawsuit, filed in New York, was withdrawn last October after reaching a CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
with Nano, says Silver.
https://decrypt.co/6396/nano-cryptocurrency-seeks-dismissal-170-million-rescue-fork-lawsuit

Plus ongoing lawsuit where judged overruled Nano:
https://casetext.com/case/fabian-v-lemahieu

>>16610857
I have enough money to do whatever I want. I care about the future of crypto space. I require very little sleep.

>>14266529
>May God have mercy on your soul.
Stop pretending to be a Christian, homo. Why is it that you idiotic nanoids always have to retort to childish ad hominem to defend your sociopath devs, pic, + failed and crashed shitcoin?

>>13792425
>Nano is limited by hardware
Same with a bicycle. Soon you will be competing with cars and your unlimited bicycle speed claim, only limited by the muscle strength, will be exposed as a total joke. Nano has a design flaw they can not overcome. There is a reason why you would not give me the TPS numbers or any estimate for the TPS in the future. Same with the Dev that was here and had to run away. Only to have my comments flagged by the Nano community.

>>13617842
You cant be this deluded right? XRP does everything nano does except colluding with scammers and gas institutional money backing it, not a hard choice.

>>12619462
>do you think no one got banned for calling out MtGox
1. Did Bitcoin link to MtGox?
2. Did Bitcoin say that MtGox were safe and vouched for them?
3. Did Bitcoin say that MtGox were great guys and not scammers/insolvent just a few weeks/days before they admitted to be hacked. Even thoug every idiot could see something was wrong. Pic related.
4. Did Bitcoin core get their and their friends KYC verified with zero problems while the rest was stuck and lost 80%?
5. Did Bitcoin core move 50 million USD out off MtGox when all accounts were frozen before the hack was announced?
6. Did Bitcoin core speak with MtGox every day and said they were good guys, nothing to worry about?
7. Did Bitcoin ban users and delete comments exposing and warning about MtGox before the hack happened?

Much of the Nano team is the same, even though many have jumped the ship after making millions of dollars. Zack and Troy. Colin is still there making the same insane business decisions. No marketing. Showing the ass to the Bitgrail victims and zero apology. Vitalik worked like crazy to help the victims. Nano did nada. These sociopaths just didn't care.

>>12613407
Sure, you can take your 5 billion USD and give them to Bruno's fleece and garage market. That is the exchange we in the Nano Dev team advice you to use. We just tweeted and confirmed that Bruno Bomber is a great guy, we talk to him every day. Your funds will be totally safe. You can trust us and bomber, as we tweeted yesterday. If you want to see Bruno Bomber just ask for the programmer-soon-scammer Bruno. That's his nickname. We in the Nano dev team is perfectly cool with that and see no reason to not vouch for him. I mean, if something happens he has promised us that WE will get our assets the hell out of his fleece and garage market exchange. So what the hell do we care? Give us your money, friend. We have 7000 TPS, don't ask too many technical questions, that will just confuse your head and you need to be alert and awake when you transfer your 5 billion to us and bomber. There are so many more important things in the world than money you know. A smile, a sunset. Enjoy the free things in life. Just give us your money dude, OK? Nano, buy Nano! BUY! BUY! NANO!!

>>12586967
Devs are shady and maybe sociopaths. To the public they told everything is fine and bomber is a good guy. At the very same time bomber moved over 200 Bitcoin out that he had stolen, while devs or some of their associates moved 50 million dollars in Nano out off Bigrail [1]. Pic is statement from Nano dev a little more than two weeks before Bitgrail admitted a "hack" and 80% of Nano assets "stolen".
More here;
https://archive.is/Wkgvn

[1] https://archive.is/Wkgvn

>>12572363
>so ETH has 30tx/sec at the base layer, nano has 700. how is that not better?
You really don't understand anything. The first layer is all about security and nobody cares about TPS. Nano was all made for speed/TPS and cut corners like crazy. Among the worst coins in regards of security and stability. So you are admitting that Nano must have a second layer? How will Nano compete with de facto a single dev, that was not even full time Nano employed 1.5 years ago, against Ethereum.
https://media.consensys.net/andrew-keys-ethereum-has-30-times-more-devs-than-the-next-blockchain-community-27980a5ddc09

Nano has not even started with their second layer approach and is years behind competitors. If Nano needs a second layer, you are doomed. There is no way you can compete. Especially not with a complete broken community after the Nano devs/management ditched and back-stabbed the Bitgrail victims, a huge and important part of the community.

>>12482197
Nano has zero transparency. Why did dev Zack jump the ship? Why did lead community manager Troy jump the ship? Why have the devs been dumping large amounts of Nanos for months? You say they need it all to develop, that's just your crack pipe dream, you have no clue. Just your faint hope, just as you had when the devs said that Bitgrail was safe and bomber a good guy. Your devs are psychopathic scammers.

>imagine being retarded enough to believe these assholes.

GOOD LUCK Nanlets