/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14948631
nice, an actual insight
1) this seems to be the case I am seeing it go right now. LN will be mostly centralized with large hubs, but this indeed would provide minimum hops
2) this seems an unnecessary complexity/obfuscation. If anything like that would be implemented, it could be done directly as a 2nd layer on top of the chain and not a 3rd layer on top of LN. I am not sure, but I think this is something how Liquid is supposed to work.
3) havent heard about this being worked on

I dont see progress with anything yet. LN adoption was picking up speed, but has stalled literally when blocks on chain got near full again. This should have accelerated LN adoption.

So, Corekeks, explain me the bright future that you are seeing. I am really trying to understand.

BTC has been getting full blocks already since end of March. This has led to the transaction count stalling. It is now even reversing and going down. This does definitely not look like progress/adoption.

So, Corekeks, explain me the bright future that you are seeing. I am really trying to understand.

BTC has been getting full blocks already since end of March. This has led to the transaction count stalling. It is now even reversing and going down. ~400k tx/day cap until maybe block size gets raised in a few years? This does definitely not look like progress/adoption.

So, Corekeks, explain me the bright future that you are seeing. I am really trying to understand.

BTC has been getting full blocks already since end of March. This has led to the transaction count stalling. It is now even reversing and going down. This does definitely not look like progress/adoption.