[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.13714833 [View]
File: 279 KB, 1438x2826, wqgypo7d5syz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13714833

This network topology is the reason why double-spends are economically inefficient to carry out, and why Bitcoin has always been able to scale, despite what some may have you think.

>> No.7966829 [View]
File: 279 KB, 1438x2826, 1519210705919.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7966829

Convince me to buy BTC.

>> No.7918175 [View]
File: 260 KB, 1438x2826, graph not mesh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7918175

>>7918082
>Nano will be lighting fast and cheap currency
Nano isn't secure. Its vulnerable to Sybil style DOS attacks. Mesh networks aren't comparable in security to world graphs.

>> No.7896877 [View]
File: 260 KB, 1438x2826, graph not mesh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7896877

>>7896248
>Fuck off Roger.
>>7896712
>Bcash is trash!!!
>>7896712
>Hi Roger
Some people are getting nervous that they can't come up with arguments.
>>7896758
>Following your le better tech logic, there are hundreds of shitcoins better than bitcoincash
At least you made an argument but it wasn't a good one. Bitcoin Cash will incorporate the features of all other coins into its blockchain, and so the only coins that are different are Hashgraph coins and DAG's which aren't secure because they are mesh networks and not graph networks. Pic related as it shows why mesh networks are centralized and graph networks are not.

>> No.7895412 [View]
File: 279 KB, 1438x2826, 1519210705919.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7895412

>I fell down a rabbit-hole of investigation.This internal conflict initially felt like, honestly, a mild psychosis, and as I discovered more, everything slowly started making sense. This shit was doublethink, straight out of Orwell's 1984. I started finding out the truth of myths like: bitcoin-core team being a huge collective, is actually a small group of around 10 devs all connected through a couple organizations -- organizations such as blockstream that have direct investments from financial institutions and services like mastercard. The block size was kept at 1MB intentionally to keep fees high and transactions slow, so the core team could create or more accurately, deliver a product to their investors in the form of infrastructure off-chain... the lightning network, the perfect model to centralize, monopolize, and record transaction data... i.e. future-proof the banking system. Everything bitcoin stood against. Roger Ver isn't some kind of scam artist, and even if he is, who the fuck cares? He isn't even responsible for bitcoin cash.

>> No.7844275 [View]
File: 260 KB, 1438x2826, graph not mesh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7844275

>>7843382
>lol retards how is bitcoin like right pic when there are several mining farms that process 90% of the transactions. the every node is equal meme is dead and dpos takes a similar approach
There was never an "every node is equal meme" it was one cpu one vote where a cpu is a central processing unit. That means those with more cpus you get more votes, like the one dollar one vote mechanism in free markets. Furthermore the topology of Bitcoin Cash is a graph network where each wallet address connects to an outside layer of mining nodes. Each wallet connects to each miner on the outside layer of the network and each miner is connected to all wallets. This is how the network is connected Bitcoin Cash is a graph network, not a mesh. Please educate yourself.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]