/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19469657
It's not only her I object to, it's the dynasties and systems she represents. Depending on how deep down the sliding scale of conspiracy theories one wants to go...
On the uppermost end of the scale, the proven/admitted/documented stuff... there's the financial shenanigans, the wars for profit, the Bilderberg type stuff. There's the common thread of contempt for their own subjects, Philip wanting to be reincarnated as a pandemic to kill enough people to lower the population. Bazillions of dollars spent on parties and palaces and gardens while a huge portion of her "subjects" (the contempt is embedded in the very language) stay poor. We'd love to help them out, but there's just not enough money in the budget, you see... There's the systems that conspire to keep the majority of the population ignorant and servile, working hard their whole lives to pay the taxes that pay for the fetes, instead of helping them blossom and expand the upper bounds of human potential. There's the surveillance state, the UK has China-level panopticon going on. The basic human right of self-defense almost totally taken away (Oi! Got a license for that teaspoon? Better bin it!), expressing thoughts and opinions can get you sent to prison, etc etc...
Don't get me wrong, all this stuff goes on over here too, and I object to that as well. It's bad enough that we worship celebrities and reality tv stars, now there's a portion of Americans obsessed with royalty too. Just like the reality shows, they cross-network, see Harry and Meghan. Depending on which conspiracy theories you believe, there's either a whole bunch of kiddie-diddling going on, with coverups right and left... or there's a network of Egyptian-Sumerian/Kabbalist/Luciferians who literally fuck, kill, and eat children because of some blend of ancient and modern religious beliefs. I don't know for sure if the latter is true of course, but if it is I'm against it. The former is pretty much an open secret.
(cont.)