/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18275926
For the same reason traps are better and usually dress much cuter than real girls: Because they are made by guys for guys. Whereas roasties are too busy projecting their slutty degeneracy, which they might find to be attractive in guys, but then mistakenly believe to also be appealing to guys. So sexually liberal girls are mistakenly under the belief that guys want sluts with high status. Because girls are more attracted to guys who already have a partner or fucked around. While guys might on the contrary even be attracted to the damsel in virginal distress.

And thus they are all disgusting sluts. Of course no sane guy wants a slut who has been fucked by one of his friends (much less the entire neighbourhood) as girlfriend. But today's society is what it is.

>>18276672
AI in particular. I really want more than just a shitty hole. Maybe we can hijack the brain and make use of a tulpa-like existence which surfaces during multiple personality disorder, but is suppressed and instead functions as input for your waifu's personality?

I find sex to be awkward, as well, OP. Especially because it's so primitive, and society displays it to us in such a primitive and "sexy" way. Thinking of a guy with his "harem" power fantasy who is holding two generic roastie thots in his arms... The only thing I can rationalize myself as "enjoying" is with a QT virgin who enjoys being coddled and bonds with me during the act. But then I wouldn't do it because I would enjoy it myself, inherently, but because there is meta knowledge of the girl just bonding this way. Which can be cute, rather than sexy. And I would only do it because it's a QT girl who deserves it. Not a generic roastie. And you know what, Anon? I think this is perfectly normal, and not wanting to sleep with every generic slut is extremely healthy.

Feminism also makes me want to hate women, desu.

That 2d > 3d.

>>17407017
no YOU are sexy