/biz/ - Business & Finance

Are you staking your link in one wallet or multiple ones? How to /max/ profit?

>>28187149
>>28187092
We killed thread, watch them open a new one to make fud

honestly thanks for shilling me this project, bought last night and already enjoying the gains. Hope the devs fulfill their goals and we all make it.

>>27238344
Unironically this. It's why Reddit is such an absolute shithole. 4chan can be described a pseudo-aggregate data collection and verification system powered by neet nodes. There is a shitload of shilling, but the shilling is relatively ineffective on efficient nodes that do their jobs properly. The job of being autistic and relying on logic and reasoning rather than dumb group-think.

>>26034926
ALL ABOOOOARRRDDD!! TRAAAIN ABOUT TO DEPART

Assuming the network grows, as it will, more collateral is required and so the price of the LINK token will increase accordingly. However, wouldn't companies be more wary about purchasing a token that has risen to $1k or more? Wouldn't they just find other ways to provide trustworthy data to others for cheaper than it would be to buy a bunch of $1k tokens?

Alright faggots, don't listen to these LARP's, here's how this really work:

Fundamentally speaking, chainlink API's will allow users to send data to their main decentrilized fundamental mainframe. What this will do is allow the customers to fundamentally buy more link tokens with their fundamental banks account. The more tokens people buy the higher the price goes fundamentally. So, fundamentally speaking, as more of this technology gets adapted to industries that are fundamental to our economy such as google and starbucks, the price will explode to over 1000k. This fundamentally will make the link hodlers more happy, which in turn will make them want to buy even more tokens in the fundamental end. Lastly as this 4th revolution kicks into high gear, this entire process, fundamentally, will fund a good mental.